Teams

CDTA S A55M7.0 5MT Bann (OUT) Castriano Sat 2 $27

CDTA 1Summer Adult 55 & Over · CDTA 55 & over M 7.0 Summer

20 players · average NTRP 3.38 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-08-16Won 20
W#1 DoublesScott Smith / Thomas Stotter vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesHoward Braun / John Stuparitz vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJoseph Castriano / Thomas Stotter vs Sean Conboy / Chuck Narunatvanich6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesHoward Braun / JEFFERY FRIED vs William Laheta / Michael Roth6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBarry Marks / Scott Reicin vs Ed Duffy / Michael Denne3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRichard Foss / Tom Levy vs Darryl Lewis / Chuck Zitnick2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 DoublesJohn Stuparitz / Matt Newman vs Patrick Casey / Michael Smith6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesGregg Orloff / Scott Reicin vs John Compton / Barry Gork6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTed Sherman / Brian Hagaman vs Jim Rowe / Gerald Gallagher2-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesHoward Braun / Ronald Schwartz vs Joseph Lyden / Michael Smith7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesScott Smith / John Stuparitz vs Barry Gork / John Compton6-3, 7-5
L#1 DoublesTed Sherman / Barry Marks vs Gerald Abbott / Brian Bonds3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMitchell Weinstein / Ronald Schwartz vs Hiren Patel / Michael Denne0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesWilliam Strickley / Richard Foss vs GREGORY JONES / Darryl Lewis2-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesScott Smith / William Strickley vs Keith Giltner / Chris Gair6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMitchell Weinstein / Richard Foss vs Dave Carlquist / Robert Barry5-7, 3-5
W#3 DoublesJoseph Castriano / John Stuparitz vs Robert Senft / James Jones6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CDTA 55 & over M 7.0 Summer have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Barry Marks
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.29
Thomas Stotter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Alex Paz
published 3.5
DAVID ALTMAN
published 3.5
3.17
Mitchell Weinstein
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
John Stuparitz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.99
Richard Foss
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.84
William Strickley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Bill Swartz
published 3
2.59
Brian Hagaman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Gregg Orloff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Howard Braun
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
JEFFERY FRIED
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Joseph Castriano
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Matt Newman
published
Ronald Schwartz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Scott Reicin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Steve Mesirow
published
Ted Sherman
published
Tom Levy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richard Foss + John Stuparitz91048% games+6.9% vs expected
John Stuparitz + William Strickley7456% games+2.8% vs expected
Mitchell Weinstein + Howard Braun5849% games−1.8% vs expected
Richard Foss + William Strickley31639% games−13.5% vs expected
John Stuparitz + Howard Braun81147% gamesnot enough data
Thomas Stotter + Mitchell Weinstein9254% gamesnot enough data
William Strickley + Howard Braun2849% gamesnot enough data
Richard Foss + Mitchell Weinstein1738% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Barry Marks
32W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.64
3.5
Thomas Stotter
52W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Alex Paz
35W–42L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
DAVID ALTMAN
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mitchell Weinstein
48W–58L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
John Stuparitz
36W–39L career · 4 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.15
Richard Foss
58W–105L career · 3 lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.99
3
William Strickley
116W–134L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Bill Swartz
8W–19L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Brian Hagaman
14W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.59
Gregg Orloff
8W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Howard Braun
59W–91L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
JEFFERY FRIED
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Joseph Castriano
24W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Matt Newman
11W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ronald Schwartz
6W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Scott Reicin
14W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Steve Mesirow
7W–20L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ted Sherman
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tom Levy
9W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.