Teams

SS-LT PINK

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-09-02vs CPV REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Paul / Amy Brink vs Mandy Short / Corby Williams4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLaurie Heath / Sarah Wells vs Alice Boutilier / Heather Harbinson6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-08-19vs CCV GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesStefania Scott / Judy Weisiger vs Becky Godsey / Jennifer Bub6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmy Brink / Sarah Wells vs Shauna Sanidas / Heather Dolan Jackson6-4, 6-4
2026-08-12vs HRCA-S PURPLELost 12
L#1 DoublesStefania Scott / Theresa Schuster vs Ann Barrett / Debbie Beirne6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLaurie Heath vs Jennifer Holladay6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Paul / Judy Weisiger vs Kylie Garrity / Leigh Morton6-7, 4-6
2026-08-08vs RRTC ORANGEWon 21
W#1 DoublesStefania Scott / Judy Weisiger vs Lisa Rowe / Ying Li2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSuzanne Paul vs Manuela Seewald1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLaurie Heath / Sarah Wells vs Yanling He / Yohana Mendoza7-6, 6-2
2026-08-05vs VCC GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesLaurie Heath / Theresa Schuster vs Carmen Mix / Wendy Titus5-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesSarah Wells vs Kadie Desoe6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesStefania Scott / Judy Weisiger vs Sara Jackson / Cammie Rausch6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-08-02vs PRKR ORANGEWon 30
W#1 DoublesAmy Brink / Stefania Scott vs Amanda Snitker / Emelina Snell6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesSarah Wells vs Stephanie Fingland6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJean Finegan / Theresa Schuster vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.28 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Sarah Wells
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.32
Stefania Scott
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.28
Suzanne Paul
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.27
Theresa Schuster
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.24
Judy Weisiger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.16
Laurie Heath
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.13
Amy Brink
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.02
Jean Finegan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suzanne Paul + Amy Brink4553% games+8.9% vs expected
Laurie Heath + Amy Brink8854% games+4.3% vs expected
Laurie Heath + Judy Weisiger8752% games+2.9% vs expected
Laurie Heath + Theresa Schuster9357% games+2.1% vs expected
Judy Weisiger + Amy Brink2842% games−2.7% vs expected
Jean Finegan + Judy Weisiger5848% games−7.2% vs expected
Jean Finegan + Amy Brink6741% games−21.1% vs expected
Theresa Schuster + Judy Weisiger51049% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Wells
17W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%2%98%
2.79
2.5
Stefania Scott
50W–64L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%90%10%
2.32
Suzanne Paul
11W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.28
2.5
Theresa Schuster
57W–45L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Judy Weisiger
58W–63L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
2.5
Laurie Heath
72W–60L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.16
2.5
Amy Brink
50W–54L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13
2.5
Jean Finegan
35W–36L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.