Teams

Walker (Dante Fascell)

2022 Miami-Dade TriLevel 18 & Over - Summer · 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 4.20 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-19vs Miami-Dade/PannellLost 01
L#1 DoublesAntonio Necuze / Tom Davidson vs Matthew Hickey / Ramon Hudec2-6, 3-6
2022-08-08vs Saborit (Ron Ehmann)Won 10
W#1 DoublesAntonio Necuze / Tom Davidson vs Donald Encinas / David Hoffman7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2022-08-03vs Miami-Dade/PannellLost 02
L#1 DoublesAntonio Necuze / Tom Davidson vs GABRIELE GHINI / Ismael Betancourt5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJavier Rodriguez / Scott Sime vs Jorge Rassi / Brett Helms3-6, 2-6
2022-08-01vs Sengupta (Crandon Park)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesTom Davidson / Antonio Necuze vs Jose Zea / Francisco Quiroz Gomez4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesNeil Bazain / Scott Sime vs Eduardo Graffe / Schubert Sengupta4-6, 2-6
2022-07-27vs Saborit (Ron Ehmann)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJavier Rodriguez / Scott Sime vs Yosvany Morejon / Oscar Fister6-7, 6-0, 0-1
2022-07-11vs Sengupta (Crandon Park)Won 10
W#1 DoublesTom Davidson / Miguel Fundora vs Brian Ahmes / Mitchell Stoller6-3, 6-4
2022-06-21vs Sengupta (Crandon Park)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesWerner Vondrak / Tom Davidson vs Jose Zea / Francisco Quiroz Gomez1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesScott Sime / Oscar Radillo vs Schubert Sengupta / Leonardo Concha3-6, 4-6
2022-06-13vs Saborit (Ron Ehmann)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTom Davidson / Miguel Fundora vs Donald Encinas / David Hoffman6-3, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Antonio Necuze
published 5
4.21
Tom Davidson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.19
Werner Vondrak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.12
Miguel Fundora
published
3.75
Christian Walker
published 4
3.60
Gustavo Tijerino
published 4
3.53
Troy Wee Tom
published
Scott Sime
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Neil Bazain
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tom Davidson + Werner Vondrak2444% gamesnot enough data
Tom Davidson + Miguel Fundora123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Antonio Necuze
1W–12L career · no lines in 2022
92%8%<1%
4.31
Tom Davidson
106W–87L career · 7 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.21
4.5
Werner Vondrak
156W–152L career · 2 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
4.19
Miguel Fundora
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
4.12
4
Christian Walker
26W–11L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Gustavo Tijerino
5W–16L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
Troy Wee Tom
20W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%40%60%
3.53
3.5
Scott Sime
46W–18L career · type S · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Neil Bazain
1W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.