← Teams

No Love

2022 Prince Georges Adult 40 & Over · Prince Georges Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-07-17vs Lady AcersLost 0–1
L#1 DoublesMichelle Washington / Linda Washington vs Cortney Mukushi / Phyllis Anderson0-6, 0-6
2022-07-16vs LoVVLost 0–1
L#1 DoublesMichelle Washington / Gwendolyn Vauss vs Robin Bennefield / Sheila Jennings7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2022-07-14vs Serving YouLost 0–2
L#1 DoublesNatalie Anderson / Obire Owinje vs Sherri Colston / Wanda Fells4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJulie Anderson / Michelle Washington vs Casey Royster / Catherine Wynne3-6, 1-6
2022-07-13vs Serving YouLost 1–2
W#1 SinglesObire Owinje vs Beverly Taylor6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLinda Washington / Gwendolyn Vauss vs Casey Royster / JENNIFER JOY2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesGale Powell / Julie Anderson vs Sherri Colston / Nikki Rawls4-6, 0-6
2022-07-09vs Lady AcersLost 0–1
L#1 DoublesGwendolyn Vauss / Julie Anderson vs Annette James / Cortney Mukushi0-6, 4-6
2022-07-08vs LoVVLost 0–1
L#3 DoublesJulie Anderson / Gale Powell vs Donnita McMillan / Roxie Landry0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Prince Georges Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Novella Bridges
published —
2.89
Obire Owinje
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.62
Michelle Washington
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published —
2.52
Gale Powell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.50
Martha Givan
published —
2.34
Gwendolyn Vauss
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
—
Pamela Owens
published —
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gwendolyn Vauss + Gale Powell3–1039% games−8.0% vs expected
Gwendolyn Vauss + Obire Owinje1–441% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Washington + Gwendolyn Vauss0–33 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

—
Novella Bridges
15W–24L career · no lines in 2022
78%22%<1%
2.90
3
Obire Owinje
49W–61L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
2.89
—
Michelle Washington
44W–103L career · 5 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
2.62
3
Gale Powell
36W–66L career · 2 lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
2.52
—
Martha Givan
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
2.50
3
Gwendolyn Vauss
43W–122L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
89%11%<1%
2.34
—
Pamela Owens
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.