Teams

Davis 6.5

2025 Montgomery Combo Spring Women · Montgomery Combo Spring 6.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-12vs Grynaviski 6.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesKathleen Burke / Leigh Leslie vs Stacy Ferguson / Mara Nelson-Grynaviski1-6, 6-0, 1-0
2025-06-02vs Start with Love 6.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesNancy Davis / Kathryn Sampson vs Denise Browne / Kamlesh Dhallan3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKathleen Burke / Justine Handelman vs Cynthia Mariz / Valerie Pierce6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJanet Lasken / Susan Greenwood vs Nancy Brown / Annette James4-6, 1-6
2025-05-29vs Quid Pro Quo Combo 6.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKathleen Burke / Janet Lasken vs Tara Cooksey / Michelle Grossman3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesNancy Davis / Helen Mahoney vs Tamara Kucik / Sanam Boroumand6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLinda Rubin / Linda Fackler vs Margaret Cornelius / Elizabeth Overmann2-6, 3-6
2025-05-23vs Wise AcesLost 01
L#3 DoublesJustine Handelman / Leigh Leslie vs Lisa Thomas / Shari Freiman6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2025-05-16vs Net Gain 6.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKathleen Burke / Leigh Leslie vs Heather FREIDKIN / Yvette Fontenot2-6, 2-6
2025-05-08vs Grynaviski 6.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKathleen Burke / Helen Mahoney vs Stacy Ferguson / Hayley Flack2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJanet Lasken / Linda Rubin vs Shara Reiter / Kristen Gold4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKathryn Sampson / Debbie Talesnick vs Erinn Locaria / Emily Murray0-6, 2-6
2025-04-24vs Quid Pro Quo Combo 6.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Greenwood / Kathleen Burke vs Margaret Cornelius / Tara Cooksey1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesNancy Davis / Debbie Talesnick vs Bonnie Skafte / Helen Chao7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMarjorie Guroff / Lanh Green vs Miranda Spivack / Lauren Richardson2-6, 0-6
2025-04-18vs Wise AcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesLeigh Leslie / Susan Greenwood vs Cara Hur / Kristin Stone6-3, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Combo Spring 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.77
Susan Greenwood
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.77
Nancy Davis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Debbie Talesnick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.71
Leigh Leslie
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.71
Justine Handelman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Helen Mahoney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.59
Kathryn Sampson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.52
Linda Fackler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.46
Marjorie Guroff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.41
Mary Ellen Shearer
published
Janet Lasken
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kathleen Burke
published
Lanh Green
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Linda Rubin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Greenwood
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Nancy Davis
16W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Debbie Talesnick
3W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Leigh Leslie
109W–137L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
Justine Handelman
14W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Helen Mahoney
5W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
Kathryn Sampson
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.59
Linda Fackler
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52
Marjorie Guroff
2W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.46
Mary Ellen Shearer
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
2.41
Janet Lasken
5W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathleen Burke
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lanh Green
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Linda Rubin
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.