Teams

CDTA W 18&OM5.0 3.RCLB Wozniczka Sun 6 $22

CDTA 1Winter 18 & Over W · E

10 players · average NTRP 4.92 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesPeter Shields / Andrew Wolfberg vs Brian Lin / Jay Wagh6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesBrandon Wozniczka vs Andris Gudins2-6, 2-6
2026-03-14Lost 01
L#1 SinglesBrandon Wozniczka vs Cole Heule2-6, 5-7
W#1 DoublesDarren Olson / Adam Reinhart vs Andris Gudins / Vittal Harith3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBrandon Wozniczka vs Andris Gudins0-6, 2-6
2026-01-25Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJohn Cheregi / Jeffrey Rutherford vs Jay Wagh / Vittal Harith2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesBrandon Wozniczka vs Tim O'Brien2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAdam Reinhart / Andrew Wolfberg vs Griffin Calkins / Brian Lin7-5, 6-1
L#1 DoublesTed Romaine / Darren Olson vs Mike Brown / Cole Heule2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesBrandon Wozniczka vs Paul Gilden2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · E
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA W 18&OM5.0 2.Tam Needler Sun 7 $2244131124168
2CDTA W 18&OM5.0 3.RCLB Wozniczka Sun 6 $2244121225176
3CDTA W 18&OM5.0 1.MTC Brown Sat 7 $33.544101428207

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.51 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.98
Alice Pacaut
published 5
4.81
Adam Reinhart
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.46
Darren Olson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.37
Andrew Wolfberg
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.36
Brandon Wozniczka
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 5
4.33
Ted Romaine
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.26
Connor Johnston
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Jeffrey Rutherford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
John Cheregi
published
Peter Shields
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Alice Pacaut
143W–36L career · no lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.98
5
Adam Reinhart
12W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.81
5
Darren Olson
30W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.46
5
Andrew Wolfberg
83W–44L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.37
5
Brandon Wozniczka
28W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.36
Ted Romaine
37W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
1%88%11%
4.33
4.5
Connor Johnston
27W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
4.26
Jeffrey Rutherford
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
John Cheregi
0W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Peter Shields
121W–52L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.