Teams

KC-CC GREEN

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-25vs HW TEALWon 20
W#1 DoublesDanielle Steadman / Holly Sharpeta vs Holly Schoolcraft / Melissa Long6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAllison Coquet / Christi Hursta vs Jessica Wise / Kristen Scarbrough5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2023-05-22vs WC BLUESplit 11
W#2 DoublesLesley Denning / Holly Sharpeta vs Elizabeth A Shields / Laura Kemper3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCheryl Amador / Christi Hursta vs Jenny Yotter / Amy Dodds1-6, 3-6
2023-05-15vs SS-LT GOLDWon 30
W#1 DoublesLesley Denning / Danielle Steadman vs Sara Percival / Emily Vatter6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKathleen Rose / Cheryl Amador vs Kelly Katsnelson / Ingrid Burke6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesAllison Coquet vs Rebecca Dalzell7-5, 6-4
2023-05-01vs LEBTC GOLDLost 12
L#1 DoublesCathy Welch / Cheryl Amador vs Melinda Grandy / Misa Sullivan6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristi Hursta / Kathy Owens vs Christine Gish / Jenny Alvarez6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesErica Smith / Allison Coquet vs Alexandra Pecoraro / Candice Vigil6-2, 7-6
2023-04-24vs KNO GOLDWon 21
W#1 DoublesSarah Bryan / Holly Sharpeta vs Jenni Young / Jodi Page6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKathleen Rose / Lesley Denning vs Jacqueline Schultz / Jessica Hunt6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCheryl Amador / Erica Smith vs Linda Prudhomme / Lori Roach2-6, 3-6
2023-04-17vs SS-H REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesLesley Denning / Holly Sharpeta vs Nancy Carlson / Kathryn Root6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKathy Owens / Cheryl Amador vs Elizabeth Gotto / Michelle Johnson6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesChristi Hursta / Allison Coquet vs Linda McOsker / Carol Fowler6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Sarah Bryan
published
3.29
Danielle Steadman
published 3.5
3.28
Holly Sharpeta
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Cathy Welch
published 3.5
3.10
Allison Coquet
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
2.79
Lesley Denning
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Alexis Rubin
published 3
2.71
Kathleen Rose
published
2.63
Christi Hursta
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.61
Cheryl Amador
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.60
Kathy Owens
published
2.50
Erica Smith
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cathy Welch + Allison Coquet5356% games+9.8% vs expected
Kathleen Rose + Cathy Welch2444% games+9.8% vs expected
Cheryl Amador + Christi Hursta9949% games+6.8% vs expected
Cheryl Amador + Allison Coquet4455% games+5.6% vs expected
Sarah Bryan + Holly Sharpeta12558% games+1.9% vs expected
Holly Sharpeta + Lesley Denning131248% games−2.6% vs expected
Christi Hursta + Allison Coquet3354% gamesnot enough data
Lesley Denning + Allison Coquet0532% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Bryan
30W–20L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Danielle Steadman
10W–7L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Holly Sharpeta
101W–68L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Cathy Welch
29W–30L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Allison Coquet
87W–54L career · type A · 4 lines in 2023
23%76%<1%
3.10
3
Lesley Denning
63W–62L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Alexis Rubin
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathleen Rose
9W–23L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Christi Hursta
109W–90L career · 4 lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
2.63
3
Cheryl Amador
56W–93L career · type A · 5 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
2.61
Kathy Owens
11W–43L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
2.60
Erica Smith
15W–23L career · no lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
2.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.