Teams

Williams Y - McGehee

2026 Duval Combo 18 & Over - Summer · 9.5 W Sunday

10 players · average NTRP 4.62 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-15vs Yards - CanadyWon 21
L#1 DoublesKaren Romero Diaz / Meredith Frisch vs Catherine Canady / Carrigan Blanchard7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCynthia McGehee / Johanna Keeline vs Casey Cohen / Alexis Schuchart7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesFranzi Herman / Melissa Glasgow vs Estela de Paula / Vita Avery6-4, 7-5
2026-08-01vs Yards - CanadySplit 11
L#2 DoublesAlyssa Kroll / Carolina Delgado vs Catherine Canady / Mary Bush3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesFranzi Herman / Cynthia McGehee vs Adeline Landeweer / Deborah Schaefer6-2, 6-0
2026-07-25vs Yards - CanadyWon 21
L#1 DoublesCarolina Delgado / Cynthia McGehee vs Mary Bush / Krista Tyson0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMeredith Frisch / Jill Saig vs Casey Cohen / Janet Thomasson6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMarianne Harper / Karen Romero Diaz vs Catherine Canady / Vita Avery6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2026-07-18vs Yards - CanadyLost 12
L#1 DoublesAlyssa Kroll / Carolina Delgado vs Catherine Canady / Vita Avery2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Romero Diaz / Jill Saig vs Adeline Landeweer / Fran Rollins6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJohanna Keeline / Cynthia McGehee vs Ashley Cowart / Mary Bush4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.5 W Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.25 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alyssa Kroll
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.47
Melissa Glasgow
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.38
Cynthia McGehee
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.28
Marianne Harper
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.26
Carolina Delgado
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.20
Anne Billion
published 4.5
4.10
Jill Saig
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.06
Meredith Frisch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Franzi Herman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Johanna Keeline
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cynthia McGehee + Anne Billion8455% games−10.8% vs expected
Meredith Frisch + Melissa Glasgow213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Alyssa Kroll
0W–6L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Melissa Glasgow
10W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%59%41%
4.47
4.5
Cynthia McGehee
35W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
4.38
Marianne Harper
17W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
0%<1%>99%
4.28
4.5
Carolina Delgado
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
4.26
4.5
Anne Billion
110W–84L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%2%
4.20
Jill Saig
35W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
4.10
Meredith Frisch
10W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
4.06
Franzi Herman
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Johanna Keeline
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.