Teams

DB - Demopolous

2022 Alachua Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-27vs WS - FergusonWon 10
W#1 DoublesChris Cochran / DALTON IEIRI vs Stefan Gerber / Nathan Wycoff6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDALTON IEIRI vs John Cornell6-0, 6-0
2022-05-05vs JTC - LancasterWon 10
W#2 DoublesMarc Schnoll / DALTON IEIRI vs Philip Lancaster / James Araujo6-0, 6-4
2022-05-02Won 10
W#2 DoublesMarc Schnoll / DALTON IEIRI vs Andrew Lewis / Vipul Patel6-1, 6-1
2022-04-24vs WS - FergusonWon 20
W#1 DoublesDALTON IEIRI / Fabio Lozano vs Darnel Dela Cruz / Jerome Valencia6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPaul Wesson / Kip Harrison vs Dale Gerber / Mehmet Genc6-4, 6-3
2022-04-17vs ALACHUA - Hawk - Tangeman/GingrichLost 02
L#2 DoublesGeorge Demopoulos / DALTON IEIRI vs Robert Tangeman / Paul Lipori5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPaul Wesson / Fabio Lozano vs Subramanyam Pasumarti / Alper Ungor2-6, 5-7
2022-04-07Won 10
W#3 DoublesGeorge Demopoulos / DALTON IEIRI vs Jamie Pomeranz / Stewart Whitmore7-5, 6-3
2022-04-01vs JTC - LancasterLost 01
L#2 DoublesPaul Wesson / Fabio Lozano vs Philip Lancaster / James Araujo6-2, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Paul Wesson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.44
DALTON IEIRI
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.25
Chris Cochran
published 3.5
3.15
Hank Dudding
published 3.5
3.00
2.88
Jeff Fox
published
2.87
Scott Travis
published
Chinemelu Anumba
published 3
2.70
Marc Schnoll
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paul Wesson + DALTON IEIRI4261% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Paul Wesson
123W–72L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%45%55%
3.52
3.5
DALTON IEIRI
134W–69L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Chris Cochran
1W–7L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Hank Dudding
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
3
George Demopoulos
21W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%50%50%
3.00
Jeff Fox
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
2.88
Scott Travis
5W–0L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Chinemelu Anumba
2W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Marc Schnoll
4W–10L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.