Teams

Satterfield/Goodman 18s 8.5W Combo Tues PM

2026 Piedmont Combo 18 & Over · 8.5 18 & Over Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 8 6:00 PM
vs
Hamilton Lakes Swim & Tennis
Sep 15 7:30 PM
vs
J Spencer Love Tennis Center
Sep 22 7:30 PM
Pinetop Tennis Club
Sep 29 6:00 PM
vs
Hamilton Lakes Swim & Tennis
Oct 6 6:00 PM
vs
Hamilton Lakes Swim & Tennis
Oct 13 7:30 PM
vs
J Spencer Love Tennis Center
2026-09-01vs Smith 18s 8.5W Combo Tues PMLost 03
L#1 DoublesYukari Matsuoka / Sayaka Matsuoka vs Heather Parr / Amanda Arkaev3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnnina Fremgen / Julie Spence vs Beth Mayer / Sarah Dunning5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMelissa Goodman / Joy Martin vs Brenda Willis / Jane Owens2-6, 3-6
2026-08-25vs McElvogue 18s 8.5W Combo Tues PMWon 20
W#1 DoublesYukari Matsuoka / Sayaka Matsuoka vs Erin Huffines / Kim Hunt6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRhyssa Earley / Allenoush Beard vs Carrie McElvogue / Sarah Cline7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2026-08-11vs Scott/Nutt 18s 8.5W Combo Tues PMLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnnina Fremgen / Allenoush Beard vs Joanna Scott / Lindsay Ray1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDiane Kroeger / Melissa Goodman vs Cari Powell / Ai Terui1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCourtney Jones / Tiffany Feaster vs Tammy Dickenson / Sarah Joplin1-6, 5-7
2026-08-04vs Goy 18s 8.5W Combo Tue PMWon 30
W#1 DoublesMelissa Goodman / Diane Kroeger vs Catherine Tanner / Jill Perez7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSayaka Matsuoka / Yukari Matsuoka vs Chetana Honnarayanahalli / Clarissa Tatum6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJoy Martin / Courtney Jones vs Gina Goy / Crystal Mercado7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 8.5 18 & Over Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Scott/Nutt 18s 8.5W Combo Tues PM2051226
2Marus/Danford 18s 8.5W Combo Wed AM2060237
3Smith 18s 8.5W Combo Tues PM2042550
4Milam 18s 8.5W Combo Tues PM1142648
5Satterfield/Goodman 18s 8.5W Combo Tues PM1133658
6Strassell 18s 8.5W Combo Wed AM1133756
7McElvogue 18s 8.5W Combo Tues PM0224965
8Goy 18s 8.5W Combo Tue PM02061273
9Alvarino/Churchill 18s 8.5W Combo Wed AM02061272

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Sayaka Matsuoka
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.79
Rhyssa Earley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Diane Kroeger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
April Wilson
published 4
3.74
Annina Fremgen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.73
Yukari Matsuoka
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.65
Joy Martin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Allenoush Beard
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.57
Melissa Goodman
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.53
Bonnie Satterfield
published 3.5
3.50
Julie Spence
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Tiffany Feaster
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Marie Dunn
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Goodman + Bonnie Satterfield10267% games+10.7% vs expected
Diane Kroeger + Rhyssa Earley8163% games+7.5% vs expected
Melissa Goodman + Diane Kroeger3350% games+2.9% vs expected
Sayaka Matsuoka + Yukari Matsuoka111248% games−2.1% vs expected
Melissa Goodman + Joy Martin3538% games−6.3% vs expected
Joy Martin + Bonnie Satterfield123 matchesnot enough data
Joy Martin + Rhyssa Earley033 matchesnot enough data
Diane Kroeger + Bonnie Satterfield123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sayaka Matsuoka
29W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.83
Rhyssa Earley
24W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Diane Kroeger
19W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.78
4
April Wilson
1W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Annina Fremgen
16W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.74
Yukari Matsuoka
32W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
Joy Martin
57W–78L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
3.65
3.5
Allenoush Beard
28W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.57
Melissa Goodman
41W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.57
3.5
Bonnie Satterfield
17W–14L career · no lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.53
Julie Spence
10W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
50%50%<1%
3.50
Tiffany Feaster
16W–35L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Marie Dunn
14W–13L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.