Teams

KY/LOU/MOORE

2022 USTA FALL 40 & Over · 4.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Gail Corso
published 4
3.51
Mary Shively
published
3.48
Jenny Jokinen
published
3.44
Kristen Brannon
published
3.40
Anne Offutt
published 3.5
3.33
Soojung Jung
published
3.30
Elena Marquette
published 3.5
3.26
Paula Adkins
published
3.20
Elizabeth Ohlmann
published 3.5
3.20
Sharen Hayden
published
3.19
Kim Greenrose
published
3.15
Bobbi Adwell
published 3.5
3.13
Shelia Colyer
published
3.00
Janice Lechleiter
published
2.81
Ellen Fontaine
published 3
Susan Hendricks
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elena Marquette + Sharen Hayden3446% games−8.0% vs expected
Sharen Hayden + Bobbi Adwell123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gail Corso
18W–26L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
Mary Shively
104W–78L career · no lines in 2022
<1%48%52%
3.51
Jenny Jokinen
24W–44L career · no lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
3.48
Kristen Brannon
33W–47L career · no lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
3.44
3.5
Anne Offutt
59W–55L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.40
Soojung Jung
33W–30L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Elena Marquette
59W–92L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Paula Adkins
31W–36L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Elizabeth Ohlmann
50W–47L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Sharen Hayden
49W–55L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.20
Kim Greenrose
66W–71L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Bobbi Adwell
46W–55L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
Shelia Colyer
14W–21L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
Janice Lechleiter
9W–29L career · no lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
3.00
3
Ellen Fontaine
11W–24L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
Susan Hendricks
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.