Teams

SRTC Murphy

2025 OH OV FALL A18&O Daytime · 3.0W Tuesday

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2025-01-07Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJessica Franklin / Laurie Hallbeck vs Sheri Hayes / Kerri Tullis0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBonnie Grieco / Pat Forster vs Michelle Lewis / Phyllis Adams2-6, 1-6
2024-12-10vs QRRC BrooksLost 12
W#1 DoublesJessica Franklin / Laurie Hallbeck vs Erin Vitale / Jessica Rippl6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTeresa Siefke vs Meredith Goel1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBonnie Grieco / Pat Forster vs Starlene Brooks / Susan Holm1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-12-03vs STC SchroederSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJessica Franklin / Laurie Hallbeck vs Janice Bensman / Jacki Francis4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesChristianna Mcname / Jane Woodford vs Joan Schroeder / Eileen Schulze7-5, 6-2
2024-11-19vs QRRC LinhardtLost 12
L#1 DoublesJessica Franklin / Laurie Hallbeck vs Edel Jesse / Melissa Conrad4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesTerri Catanzaro vs Kerri Tullis6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPat Forster / Bonnie Grieco vs Sheri Hayes / Phyllis Adams6-1, 6-4
2024-11-12vs QRRC BrooksLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristianna Mcname / Teresa Siefke vs Laura Darden / Starlene Brooks2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesTerri Catanzaro vs Meredith Goel1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJane Woodford / Maureen Murphy vs Mary Walblay / Jo Bouchard1-6, 2-6
2024-11-05vs STC SchroederWon 20
W#1 DoublesJessica Franklin / Laurie Hallbeck vs Andrea Weigand / Eileen Schulze6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesTerri Catanzaro vs Cathy Bauer6-3, 6-0
2024-10-22vs QRRC LinhardtLost 02
L#1 DoublesJane Woodford / Pat Forster vs Kerri Tullis / Sheri Hayes0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJessica Franklin / Laurie Hallbeck vs Michelle Lewis / Ailing Weng5-7, 3-6
2024-10-15vs QRRC BrooksLost 03
L#1 DoublesPat Forster / Jane Woodford vs Laura Darden / Mary Walblay6-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesTerri Catanzaro vs Gretchen Trubee6-7, 1-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTeresa Siefke / Maureen Murphy vs Jessica Rippl / Emily Fitch3-6, 3-6
2024-10-08vs STC SchroederLost 02
L#1 DoublesJessica Franklin / Laurie Hallbeck vs Karima Buchholz / Jacki Francis4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChristianna Mcname / Maureen Murphy vs Joan Schroeder / Raenell Poynter6-7, 2-6
2024-09-24vs QRRC LinhardtLost 03
L#1 DoublesJessica Franklin / Laurie Hallbeck vs Beth Andrews / Kendra Roth2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesTerri Catanzaro vs Kerri Tullis2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJane Woodford / Maureen Murphy vs Sheri Hayes / Sherley Kurtz1-6, 3-6
2024-09-17vs QRRC BrooksLost 12
L#1 DoublesLaurie Hallbeck / Jessica Franklin vs Mary Welfle / Starlene Brooks3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesTerri Catanzaro vs Sydney Corbean2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesPat Forster / Bonnie Grieco vs Hilary Smith / Melissa Schulz6-2, 6-2
2024-09-10vs STC SchroederSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJessica Franklin / Laurie Hallbeck vs Janice Bensman / Raenell Poynter6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesTerri Catanzaro vs Cathy Bauer6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.0W Tuesday
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1QRRC Brooks111241228248
2QRRC Linhardt75221433278
3SRTC Murphy11082552333

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.78
Bonnie Grieco
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Christianna Mcname
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.72
Teresa Siefke
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.41
Pat Forster
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.27
Jane Woodford
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Jennifer Disbrow
published
Laurie Hallbeck
usually #1 Doubles 90%, also #2 Doubles 10% · published
Maureen Murphy
published
Terri Catanzaro
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pat Forster + Bonnie Grieco261656% games+8.2% vs expected
Pat Forster + Jane Woodford044 matchesnot enough data
Christianna Mcname + Teresa Siefke033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Bonnie Grieco
29W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
2.78
3
Christianna Mcname
30W–42L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
2.76
Teresa Siefke
48W–43L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%5%95%
2.72
Pat Forster
36W–36L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%77%23%
2.41
Jane Woodford
10W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.27
Jennifer Disbrow
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Laurie Hallbeck
2W–16L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Maureen Murphy
1W–31L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Terri Catanzaro
15W–26L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.