Teams

Neames/18/3.5/WN/CCL

2024 City Championship 18 & Over - Women Night · 3.5 (18&O) Women Night

16 players · average NTRP 3.25 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings10 teams · 3.5 (18&O) Women Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hottes/18/WN/BREC9036927288
2Jaureguy/18/3.5/WN/BREC8136924300
3Bordlee/18/3.5/WN/BREC63242147359
4Jenkins/18/3.5/WN/BREC54242145371
5deVeer/18/3.5/WN/BREC54252048374
6Murrell/18/3.5/WN/BRCC45202558430
7Rosenfeld/18/3.5/WN/UC45192658440
8Davis/18/3.5/WN/LSU-O27162964434
9Neames/18/3.5/WN/CCL27153065446
10Geci/18/3.5/WN/LEGA09103572466

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Randi Peltier
published
3.31
Tricia Bruno
published
3.29
Alletia Sellers
published 3.5
3.22
Katie South
published
3.21
Jessica Cuba
published
3.19
TIne Neames
published
3.13
Nicole LaNasa
published
2.96
Marsha Jumonville
published
2.91
Rondi Cowart
published
2.88
Valerie DeBosier
published
Crystal Donovan
published 3
2.72
Shelli St Romain
published
2.58
Lauren Bordelon
published
Joanne Harvey
published
Kara Hebert
published
Marla Toups
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shelli St Romain + Rondi Cowart2348% games+0.4% vs expected
Nicole LaNasa + Jessica Cuba7648% games+0.3% vs expected
Nicole LaNasa + Valerie DeBosier1442% games−1.3% vs expected
Alletia Sellers + Tricia Bruno4949% games−3.8% vs expected
Tricia Bruno + Katie South5164% gamesnot enough data
Alletia Sellers + Katie South314 matchesnot enough data
Randi Peltier + Katie South314 matchesnot enough data
Marla Toups + Rondi Cowart404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Randi Peltier
59W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%46%54%
3.51
Tricia Bruno
43W–28L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Alletia Sellers
33W–34L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%5%
3.29
Katie South
38W–15L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.22
Jessica Cuba
43W–47L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.21
TIne Neames
49W–55L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
Nicole LaNasa
18W–41L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.13
Marsha Jumonville
10W–18L career · no lines in 2024
61%39%<1%
2.96
Rondi Cowart
51W–34L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
2.91
Valerie DeBosier
24W–40L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
2.88
3
Crystal Donovan
12W–33L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Shelli St Romain
20W–33L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%2%
2.72
Lauren Bordelon
12W–12L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
2.58
Joanne Harvey
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kara Hebert
0W–12L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Marla Toups
26W–15L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.