Teams

WASHOE TENNIS CLUB/WASHOE TC 18AW4.5A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 4.5

17 players · average NTRP 4.29 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesJessica Lankton / Christie Cooley vs Marissa Fullum-Campbell / Jessica Abels6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAngela Bader vs Jennifer Mann6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesFritzie Dorais / Alissa Watts vs Alicia Deffebach / CAREY Corfield2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMary Alice Pisani / Jamie Parker vs Jenna Tempkin / Laura Pierce4-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesVirginia Joel / Andrea Park vs Jane Fortner / Lucretia Conklin4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesChrystelle Musquin vs Jennifer Mann6-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesChristie Cooley / Holly Tappan vs Marissa Fullum-Campbell / Jessica Abels6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAlissa Watts / Fritzie Dorais vs Lisa Abbott / Laura Pierce4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesVirginia Joel / Jessica Lankton vs Lisa Abbott / Jenna Tempkin6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesHolly Tappan vs Laura Pierce6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChloe Ziegler / Chrystelle Musquin vs Denise Hallerbach / Caryn Swobe1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesChristie Cooley vs Jane Fortner6-4, 6-1
L#1 DoublesFritzie Dorais / Alissa Watts vs Alicia Deffebach / Lucretia Conklin4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesChristie Cooley vs Jennifer Mann6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJessica Lankton / Holly Tappan vs Megan Fish / Jenna Tempkin7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChloe Ziegler / Debra Ziegler vs Lisa Abbott / CAREY Corfield3-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesChristie Cooley / Jessica Lankton vs Lucretia Conklin / Kari Shrives6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesHolly Tappan / Chloe Ziegler vs Becky Tam / Megan Fish6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJamie Parker / Chrystelle Musquin vs Caryn Swobe / Denise Hallerbach3-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesKimberly Becker / Kimberly Lewis vs Jenna Tempkin / Lucretia Conklin5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesChrystelle Musquin vs Denise Hallerbach4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesHolly Tappan / Mary Alice Pisani vs Jane Fortner / Laura Pierce4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesChristie Cooley / Lynley Payne vs Alicia Deffebach / CAREY Corfield6-4, 7-5
L#1 DoublesLynley Payne / Sara Pierce vs Lucretia Conklin / Alicia Deffebach3-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesChristie Cooley vs Jennifer Mann6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKimberly Becker / Kimberly Lewis vs Laura Pierce / Lisa Abbott6-3, 7-6
L#2 SinglesAngela Bader vs Jane Fortner1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChloe Ziegler / Debra Ziegler vs Megan Fish / Becky Tam3-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesAndrea Park / Jessica Lankton vs Becky Tam / Denise Hallerbach6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJamie Parker vs Laura Pierce0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesChristie Cooley / Lynley Payne vs Lisa Abbott / CAREY Corfield6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesHolly Tappan vs Jennifer Mann7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesChrystelle Musquin / Angela Bader vs Kari Shrives / Kirstin Kolpitcke2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.11 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.54
Holly Tappan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
4.49
Jessica Lankton
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
4.39
Andrea Park
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.29
Virginia Joel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.26
Christie Cooley
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.20
Polly Paulsen
published
4.18
Fritzie Dorais
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.13
Kimberly Becker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.10
Chrystelle Musquin
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4.5
4.05
Alissa Watts
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.00
Debra Ziegler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.96
Angela Bader
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.94
Chloe Ziegler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.72
Mary Alice Pisani
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.42
Jamie Parker
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Lynley Payne
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sara Pierce
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jamie Parker + Chrystelle Musquin4250% games+6.2% vs expected
Fritzie Dorais + Alissa Watts7743% games−9.1% vs expected
Christie Cooley + Kimberly Becker314 matchesnot enough data
Christie Cooley + Jessica Lankton303 matchesnot enough data
Holly Tappan + Jessica Lankton303 matchesnot enough data
Chloe Ziegler + Debra Ziegler033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Holly Tappan
40W–4L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
4.54
Jessica Lankton
13W–3L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
4.49
4.5
Andrea Park
11W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
4.39
Virginia Joel
14W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
4.29
4.5
Christie Cooley
23W–8L career · 7 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
4.26
Polly Paulsen
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
4.20
Fritzie Dorais
17W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
4.18
Kimberly Becker
23W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
4.13
4.5
Chrystelle Musquin
11W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
4.10
4.5
Alissa Watts
9W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
4.05
4
Debra Ziegler
17W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
4.00
4
Angela Bader
17W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Chloe Ziegler
7W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.94
Mary Alice Pisani
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Jamie Parker
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
3.42
Lynley Payne
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sara Pierce
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.