Teams

GOLDMAN TC 18AM4.5D

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 4.5

16 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-04-17vs GLTF/GOLDMAN TC 18AM4.5AWon 40
W#1 DoublesJonathan Risos / Dominic D'Costa vs Mark Dinh / Tycho Lamberigts3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesGarrett Brinker vs Brian Vercauteren6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAnthony Su / Aaron Crawford vs Gabriel Ibarra / Bryan Chung6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDaniel Luo / Matt Bushell vs Michael Trainer / Eliseo Amezcua6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.21 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.49
Daniel Luo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.49
Aaron Crawford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.45
Michael Damiani
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
4.29
Blake McGinley
published 4.5
4.29
Dominic D'Costa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Anthony Su
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.24
Julio Mora
published
4.23
Richard Khoe
published
4.21
Garrett Brinker
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.21
4.15
Jonathan Risos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.15
Kevin Yeh
published
4.08
Christopher Phan
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 4.5
4.08
Yu Ning Yu
published
3.97
Matt Bushell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.76
Robert Nathanson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aaron Crawford + Matt Bushell123 matchesnot enough data
Richard Khoe + Jonathan Risos213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Daniel Luo
8W–1L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
<1%52%48%
4.49
4.5
Aaron Crawford
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%54%46%
4.49
Michael Damiani
20W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%63%37%
4.45
4.5
Blake McGinley
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
4.29
Dominic D'Costa
9W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
4.29
4.5
Anthony Su
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Julio Mora
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
4.24
Richard Khoe
13W–5L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
4.23
Garrett Brinker
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
4.21
Nicklas Chen Schmidt
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
4.21
Jonathan Risos
16W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%1%
4.15
Kevin Yeh
11W–4L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
4.15
4.5
Christopher Phan
68W–42L career · 11 lines in 2025
27%72%<1%
4.08
Yu Ning Yu
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
4.08
Matt Bushell
3W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.97
Robert Nathanson
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
3.76

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.