Teams

Genesis Rock Road - MXD FLEX 2

2024 KS 18 & Over Mixed Indoor League · 5.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 2.90 / KANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-12-16vs Genesis Rock Road - MXD FLEX 1Split 11
W#1 DoublesAnand Vennavelli / Nikki McCoy vs Kahlil Saad / Miriam Saad7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesABDULLA NAIM / Amber Wilson vs Joseph Stierwalt / Kym Ratcliffe3-6, 0-6
2023-12-12vs Genesis Rock Road - MXD FLEX 1Lost 01
L#1 DoublesABDULLA NAIM / Joni Duran vs Peter Ratcliffe / Kim Ritchie3-6, 5-7
2023-12-09vs Genesis Rock Road - MXD FLEX 1Split 11
L#1 DoublesAnand Vennavelli / Nikki McCoy vs Peter Ratcliffe / Kym Ratcliffe1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesABDULLA NAIM / Joni Duran vs Shuo Li / Jennifer Lee6-4, 7-6
2023-12-05vs Genesis Rock Road - MXD FLEX 1Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAnand Vennavelli / Rosanne Greene vs Peter Ratcliffe / Erica Combs6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2023-12-02vs Genesis Rock Road - MXD FLEX 1Split 11
W#1 DoublesAnand Vennavelli / Rosanne Greene vs Peter Ratcliffe / Charissa Evans6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNick Staples / Amber Wilson vs Shuo Li / Jennifer Lee7-5, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 5.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Genesis Rock Road - MXD FLEX 130451176
2Bulnes - Genesis, Salina000000
3Morris - Genesis, Wichita000000
4Genesis Rock Road - MXD FLEX 2033614103

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.10
Zach Loomis
published
2.95
NOURA ABBAS
published
2.85
Anand Vennavelli
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Chrissie Laird
published 3
Amber Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Arthur Jimenez
published 3
2.65
Joni Duran
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.52
ABDULLA NAIM
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.11
Rosanne Greene
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nick Staples
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Nikki McCoy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joni Duran + ABDULLA NAIM4150% gamesnot enough data
Amber Wilson + ABDULLA NAIM213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Zach Loomis
47W–19L career · no lines in 2024
23%76%<1%
4.10
NOURA ABBAS
29W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
Anand Vennavelli
30W–36L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%86%14%
2.85
3
Chrissie Laird
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Amber Wilson
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Arthur Jimenez
0W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Joni Duran
34W–43L career · 2 lines in 2024
15%85%1%
2.65
2.5
ABDULLA NAIM
21W–23L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%44%56%
2.52
Rosanne Greene
21W–45L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Nick Staples
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Nikki McCoy
7W–17L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.