Teams

SOAKS DAVIS

2025 FW USTA Winter Social 18+ Ladies - N · A

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-02-08vs RTC OYEBOLA (court collective)Won 30
W#1 DoublesLeah Friels / Mariann Billings vs Shanna C Oyebola / Brandie Coleman6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesSarah Boudrika vs Paola Tirado6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTamara Pecoraro-Harris / Ashley Early vs MaKayla Dorrough / Taliah Royal6-1, 6-1
2025-01-18vs RTC OYEBOLA (court collective)Won 30
W#1 DoublesTaylor Ratliff / Tamara Pecoraro-Harris vs MaKayla Dorrough / Shanna C Oyebola6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMariann Billings vs Paola Tirado6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAshley Early / Courtney Lackey vs Countess Dudley / Brandie Coleman6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for A have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Sarah Boudrika
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.15
Taylor Ratliff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Leah Friels
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Alejandra Davis
published 3
2.89
Mariann Billings
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.81
Courtney Lackey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Kim Peck
published
2.63
Tamara Pecoraro-Harris
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.51
Ashley Early
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.47
Lorane Rea
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Peck + Ashley Early123 matchesnot enough data
Ashley Early + Tamara Pecoraro-Harris123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Boudrika
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Taylor Ratliff
22W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.15
Leah Friels
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.06
3
Alejandra Davis
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
Mariann Billings
24W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Courtney Lackey
9W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Kim Peck
8W–16L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
Tamara Pecoraro-Harris
7W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.63
3
Ashley Early
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
2.51
Lorane Rea
4W–12L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.47

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.