Teams

Grieger - Beerman

2021 Polk Adult 18 & Over - Women · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-08vs Polk - Smart Aces Giusto/BeermanLost 02
L#1 SinglesSvetlana Darrow vs Jennifer Spann1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKATHERINE FOLSOM / Ginger Davis vs Nicole Giusto / Cassie Miller0-6, 2-6
2021-06-01vs Ritter - Beerman TennisWon 20
W#1 SinglesSvetlana Darrow vs Jennifer Payne6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRegina Espitia / Ginger Davis vs Mandy Jarrett / Allison Beeman6-2, 6-3
2021-05-25vs Norman - Lakeland Country ClubWon 20
W#1 SinglesSvetlana Darrow vs Lauren Clark6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKim Martin / Ginger Davis vs Anna Clark / Kerrie Hall0-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-05-11vs Racquet Love Collins - BeermanWon 20
W#1 SinglesSvetlana Darrow vs Stacey Osmon6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKATHERINE FOLSOM / Ginger Davis vs Leilani Guinn / Jennifer Burns6-0, 6-1
2021-05-04vs Polk - Smart Aces Giusto/BeermanLost 02
L#1 SinglesSvetlana Darrow vs Jennifer Spann1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKATHERINE FOLSOM / Ginger Davis vs Nicole Giusto / Heidi Zepeda3-6, 1-6
2021-04-27vs Ritter - Beerman TennisLost 02
L#1 DoublesKim Martin / Ginger Davis vs Karen Hogg / Hayley Hurd6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSvetlana Darrow / Regina Espitia vs Geraldine Tardy / Mandy Jarrett6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2021-03-30vs Racquet Love Collins - BeermanLost 01
L#2 DoublesKim Martin / Svetlana Darrow vs Wendi Wood / Danielle Adkins3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Ginger Davis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.82
Senita Hanif
published
2.81
Laurie Grieger
published
2.75
Svetlana Darrow
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.73
Leisa Jordan
published
2.67
Regina Espitia
published
2.31
Diane Barrera
published 2.5
Mary Stine
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ginger Davis + Svetlana Darrow213 matchesnot enough data
Senita Hanif + Regina Espitia033 matchesnot enough data
Laurie Grieger + Regina Espitia123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ginger Davis
113W–97L career · 6 lines in 2021
65%35%<1%
2.95
Senita Hanif
10W–21L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
2.82
Laurie Grieger
12W–18L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
2.81
Svetlana Darrow
86W–95L career · 7 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
2.75
Leisa Jordan
5W–9L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.73
Regina Espitia
3W–9L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
2.67
2.5
Diane Barrera
4W–3L career · no lines in 2021
0%93%7%
2.31
Mary Stine
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.