Teams

LATA 3.0W 65 & Over (Anderson)

2026 Adult 65 & Over · Adult Women - 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · Adult Women - 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LATA 3.0W 65 & Over (Anderson)000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Katherine Stephens
published
2.92
Rita Anderson
published
2.90
Doni Jordan
published
2.88
Renee Nisbet
published
2.87
Kay Chrysostom
published
2.87
Jo Norris
published
2.86
Jayne Woodward
published
2.69
Lynn Hammond
published
2.69
Mae Andrews
published
2.65
M Brinkley
published
2.65
Micki Barber
published
2.43
Betsy Nunnery
published 3
Sandra Penland
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rita Anderson + Kay Chrysostom044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katherine Stephens
2W–10L career · no lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
3.01
Rita Anderson
2W–18L career · no lines in 2026
<1%72%27%
2.92
Doni Jordan
1W–4L career · no lines in 2026
77%23%<1%
2.90
Renee Nisbet
15W–17L career · no lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
2.88
Kay Chrysostom
14W–30L career · no lines in 2026
82%18%<1%
2.87
Jo Norris
0W–5L career · no lines in 2026
82%18%<1%
2.87
Jayne Woodward
32W–21L career · no lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86
Lynn Hammond
6W–12L career · no lines in 2026
9%89%1%
2.69
Mae Andrews
20W–31L career · no lines in 2026
9%89%1%
2.69
M Brinkley
42W–74L career · no lines in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65
Micki Barber
23W–74L career · no lines in 2026
15%85%1%
2.65
3
Betsy Nunnery
8W–32L career · no lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
2.43
Sandra Penland
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.