Teams

Bratton/Memphis

2025 Tri-Level 18 & Over - Memphis · 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.83 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-10vs Carpenter/MemphisLost 01
L#1 DoublesDorothy Work / Adrienne Herbek vs Carrie Siler / Ashley Huggins4-6, 2-6
2025-07-02vs Grady/MemphisLost 01
L#1 DoublesMegan Toms / Adrienne Herbek vs Christine Woods / Carolyn Santos5-7, 6-7
2025-06-26vs Steinhausler/MemphisWon 10
W#1 DoublesAllie Oberson / Adrienne Herbek vs Breeana Crouch / Brenda Armstrong4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-06-05vs Charping/MemphisWon 10
W#1 DoublesCait Shirilla / Adrienne Herbek vs Angela Wood / Heather Hunt6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Anne Higgins
published 4
3.73
Gabriella Yarbrough
published
3.67
3.50
Kimberly Mitchell
published
3.37
Katie Ansel
published
3.35
Donna Coffman
published
3.28
Adrienne Herbek
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Melony Bratton
published
3.01
Victoria Jackson
published
2.68
Taylor TerBurgh
published
Juliet Wagner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Coffman + Kimberly Mitchell6555% games+3.0% vs expected
Anne Higgins + Melony Bratton6455% games+2.4% vs expected
Katie Ansel + Taylor TerBurgh213 matchesnot enough data
Donna Coffman + Melony Bratton123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anne Higgins
45W–20L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Gabriella Yarbrough
16W–11L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Christen Lundgren
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Kimberly Mitchell
10W–11L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.50
Katie Ansel
25W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.37
Donna Coffman
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Adrienne Herbek
24W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.28
Melony Bratton
43W–37L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Victoria Jackson
11W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.01
Taylor TerBurgh
5W–11L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Juliet Wagner
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.