Teams

A4 Westwood West

2023 Richmond Combo Mixed · Richmond Combo Mixed 6.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.75 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-11-18vs A5 Hermitage LinesWon 10
W#3 DoublesJulia Baker / Yancey Jones vs Alison Chesson / Rob Chesson6-2, 6-1
2023-11-05vs A1 acac Mixed up JonesieLost 01
L#2 DoublesBobbie Lou Oley / Dustin Dyer vs Glenn Pfluger / Jodi Tandett1-6, 3-6
2023-10-15vs A8 Salisbury TotaroWon 10
W#2 DoublesBobbie Lou Oley / Dustin Dyer vs Stacey Piotrowski / Paul Piotrowski6-0, 6-2
2023-10-01vs A2 WOCC HamlinSplit 11
W#1 DoublesYancey Jones / Sarah Thomas vs Jim Kennedy / Melissa Mathe6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJoseph Jones / Kacie Painter vs Mansi Shah / Bernly Bressler6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2023-09-17vs A11 ACAC Johnston 6.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesBlake Wehman / Kacie Painter vs Matt Pepple / Debra Flight6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Mixed 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Yancey Jones
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.78
Jacob Dyer
published
3.70
Katy Holder
published
3.69
Bobbie Lou Oley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.67
Blake Wehman
published 3.5
3.54
Kacie Painter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Procter Fishburne
published
3.37
James Mullahy
published
3.30
Jamie McLeod
published
3.25
Elizabeth West
published
Christopher Hester
published 3.5
3.21
Katie Fitts
published
3.20
Patricia Bishop
published
3.15
Sarah Thomas
published
3.10
Joseph Jones
published
2.92
Ken West
published
2.86
Julia Baker
published
2.69
George Bishop
published
Ragan Dyer
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Yancey Jones
89W–38L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.90
Jacob Dyer
12W–14L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
Katy Holder
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Bobbie Lou Oley
139W–64L career · 9 lines in 2023
9%89%1%
3.69
3.5
Blake Wehman
11W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%12%88%
3.67
Kacie Painter
196W–63L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%38%62%
3.54
Procter Fishburne
17W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.38
James Mullahy
22W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.37
Jamie McLeod
11W–11L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.30
Elizabeth West
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Christopher Hester
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Katie Fitts
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
Patricia Bishop
9W–19L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
Sarah Thomas
9W–4L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%1%
3.15
Joseph Jones
10W–4L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
Ken West
13W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
2.92
Julia Baker
13W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
2.86
George Bishop
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.69
Ragan Dyer
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.