Teams

ORear

2025 Tuscaloosa USTA Adult Fall-Weeknight 18&over · 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-11vs TTC - Thomas 2.5 WomenWon 30
W#1 DoublesRiley ORear / Susanna Whitehead vs Nicole Pepper / Aidan Clark6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesDrea Westgaard vs Alana Norris6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAndrea Shelton / Tricia Murphy vs Lucy Gaddy / Nnambi Coleman6-2, 6-3
2024-12-07vs TTC - Thomas 2.5 WomenWon 20
W#1 DoublesTricia Murphy / Susanna Whitehead vs Lucy Gaddy / Aidan Clark6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAndrea Shelton / Drea Westgaard vs Brenda Sayre / Amy Taylor6-2, 6-4
2024-11-24vs TTC - Thomas 2.5 WomenWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusanna Whitehead / Tricia Murphy vs Brenda Sayre / Jenifer Spears6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesRiley ORear vs Amy Taylor6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesAndrea Shelton / Pamela Welbourne vs Margaret Nasir / Beth Thomas6-0, 7-6
2024-10-30vs TTC - Thomas 2.5 WomenWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Harper / Tricia Murphy vs Lucy Gaddy / Margaret Nasir6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesRiley ORear vs Alana Norris6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAndrea Shelton / Drea Westgaard vs Brenda Sayre / Nicole Pepper6-1, 6-0
2024-10-16vs TTC - Thomas 2.5 WomenWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusanna Whitehead / Susan Harper vs Alana Norris / Nnambi Coleman6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRiley ORear vs Aidan Clark6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAndrea Shelton / Drea Westgaard vs Brenda Sayre / Nicole Pepper6-3, 6-3
2024-10-09vs TTC - Thomas 2.5 WomenWon 20
W#1 DoublesDrea Westgaard / Susanna Whitehead vs Amy Taylor / Margaret Nasir6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesTricia Murphy vs Beth Thomas6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.37 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.55
Drea Westgaard
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.55
Tricia Murphy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
2.52
Pamela Welbourne
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Andrea Shelton
published 2.5
2.16
Riley ORear
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.08
Susanna Whitehead
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Harper
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Drea Westgaard
17W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%35%65%
2.55
Tricia Murphy
20W–22L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%37%63%
2.55
Pamela Welbourne
8W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
2.52
2.5
Andrea Shelton
1W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Riley ORear
9W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.16
Susanna Whitehead
6W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Susan Harper
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.