Teams

CSU GREEN

2024 CTA WOMEN'S DAYTIME DOUBLES - NOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - DAYTIME - NOCO

8 players · average NTRP 3.17 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-06-12vs FCCC REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesBethany Chambers / Deanna Bekkedahl vs Angie Decklever / Crystal Osthoff0-6, 4-6
2024-06-05vs LT PURPLESplit 11
L#1 DoublesTeri Ouar / Lori Rasmussen vs Cindy Short / Bettina Cosima Larrarte4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesBethany Chambers / Deanna Bekkedahl vs Lora Griffith / Bernita Sterling6-1, 6-2
2024-05-29vs LVTA ORANGEWon 10
W#1 DoublesTeri Ouar / Bethany Chambers vs Sarah Duty / Jessica Oldfield2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-05-22vs TAG WHITEWon 10
W#2 DoublesBethany Chambers / Deanna Bekkedahl vs Kelsi Wagner / Kimberly Wagner6-4, 6-2
2024-05-15vs HMTC SILVERLost 01
L#1 DoublesTeri Ouar / Bethany Chambers vs Michelle Fang / Alli Lackey3-6, 4-6
2024-05-08vs FCCC REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesWendy Sprague / Bethany Chambers vs Angie Decklever / Marla Terwilliger1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - DAYTIME - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Bethany Chambers
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.02
Teri Ouar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.72
Jamie Heckman
published
2.65
Holly Rodriguez
published
2.55
Tiffany Burns
published
2.48
Deanna Bekkedahl
published 3
2.40
Wendy Sprague
published
Lori Rasmussen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Teri Ouar + Bethany Chambers5450% gamesnot enough data
Holly Rodriguez + Jamie Heckman134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Bethany Chambers
67W–37L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%31%69%
3.07
3.5
Teri Ouar
67W–48L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.02
Jamie Heckman
10W–14L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.72
Holly Rodriguez
9W–14L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
2.65
Tiffany Burns
3W–9L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
2.55
3
Deanna Bekkedahl
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
2.48
Wendy Sprague
3W–24L career · no lines in 2024
76%24%<1%
2.40
Lori Rasmussen
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.