Teams

BHSC-Binko/Ewing

2025 Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over · Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.44 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-06-14vs Baby Got Backhand-MurrWon 21
W#1 DoublesAllison Ewing / Victoria Tremaglio vs Lynne Gibson / Linda Corradino6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesHeidi Binko / Shannon Henderson vs Megan Murr / Carlin Conner6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDiane Burns / Michele Rowan vs Susan Button / Kathryn Davis4-6, 1-6
2025-05-27vs LM Sets on the Beach-FletcherLost 02
L#1 DoublesSue Frazier / Victoria Tremaglio vs Tricia Hulsey / Heather Bilderback4-6, 4-5
L#2 DoublesAllison Ewing / Jenny Furlow vs Elizabeth Young / Jane Fletcher4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-05-22vs BHSC-Hoover/MooreLost 01
L#1 DoublesJenny Furlow / Sue Frazier vs Jamie Heffernan / Allie Bryan4-6, 0-6
2025-05-15vs ACAC Court Queens-BaylissWon 20
W#1 DoublesVictoria Tremaglio / Sue Frazier vs Pamela Jupin / Karin Jones6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesLaura Leetzow / Jenny Furlow vs Stephanie Lewandowski / Susan Bayliss6-1, 6-2
2025-05-01vs Farmington-FaulconerWon 10
W#2 DoublesAllison Ewing / Jenny Furlow vs Stefanie Massony / Susanna Holt6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Jenny Furlow
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.39
Shannon Henderson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Cate Zahl
published 3.5
3.27
Laura Leetzow
published
3.26
Sue Frazier
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Heidi Binko
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Allison Ewing
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Courtney Heyward
published 3.5
3.13
Gina Mancuso
published 3.5
3.04
Mary Anne Burns
published
2.99
Diane Burns
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Michele Rowan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Victoria Tremaglio
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jenny Furlow
144W–102L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.55
Shannon Henderson
27W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Cate Zahl
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.36
Laura Leetzow
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Sue Frazier
35W–41L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Heidi Binko
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Allison Ewing
16W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Courtney Heyward
13W–10L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Gina Mancuso
3W–12L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
Mary Anne Burns
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.04
3
Diane Burns
13W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
Michele Rowan
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Victoria Tremaglio
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.