Teams

Eagle Harbor - Keller

2024 Duval Adult 55 & Over - Men · 8.0 Adult 55 & Over - Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-03-17Won 10
W#2 DoublesThomas Keller / Dan Singleton vs John Fraser / Thomas Pearrow6-3, 6-4
2024-03-10vs Florida/Devos/55&Over8.0MWon 10
W#3 DoublesWalter Rios / Dan Singleton vs Cort Raithel / Herve Devos6-3, 6-4
2024-03-03vs Florida/Devos/55&Over8.0MSplit 11
L#2 DoublesDan Singleton / Walter Rios vs Peter Snell / Alan Hopkins3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRyan Mitchell / Matt Hutto vs Tony Hennies / Rocky Rockwell6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMatt Hutto / Dan Singleton vs William Romond / John Fraser7-5, 6-1
2024-01-28vs Julington Creek - SmithWon 10
W#2 DoublesDan Singleton / Jose Feliciano vs Greg Bailey / Alan Belcher6-0, 5-7, 1-0
2024-01-14vs Magnolia Point - FritzWon 10
W#2 DoublesMatt Hutto / Dan Singleton vs Norman Barelare / Bradley Moe6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult 55 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Thomas Keller
published
3.80
Joseph Massaro
published
3.77
Matt Hutto
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.70
Dan Singleton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Gregory Sapp
published
3.58
Jose Feliciano
published
3.56
Walter Rios
published
3.37
Ray Williams
published
3.27
David Phillips
published 3.5
James Meekins
published
James Turnbull
published
Lucian Lawley
published
Ryan Mitchell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dan Singleton + Matt Hutto351854% games+4.4% vs expected
Dan Singleton + Jose Feliciano10653% games+2.2% vs expected
Dan Singleton + Thomas Keller123 matchesnot enough data
Matt Hutto + Jose Feliciano213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Thomas Keller
7W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%13%
3.84
Joseph Massaro
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.80
Matt Hutto
96W–50L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Dan Singleton
136W–103L career · 6 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.70
Gregory Sapp
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.63
Jose Feliciano
82W–63L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.58
Walter Rios
1W–9L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.56
Ray Williams
16W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
David Phillips
9W–13L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
James Meekins
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
James Turnbull
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lucian Lawley
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Ryan Mitchell
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.