Teams

PAM WHITTINGTON

2025 SETX 40 & Over Mixed · 6.0 40 & Over Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 2.83 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-02-06vs Mixed NutsWon 21
W#1 DoublesWilford Blackwell / Kristin Stumbo vs Jason Boyd / Stacie Boyd7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDaniel Rowe / Lori Moore vs Kyle Stratton / Bridgett Hlavinka6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAshley Stone / Barri Hoffman vs Roberto Diaz-Diosdado / Shelly Geis7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2025-02-03vs Fox & FriendsLost 12
W#1 DoublesDaniel Rowe / Lori Moore vs Youssef El Hardouz / Autumn Heseman6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesRodney Archer / Pam Whittington vs Randall Richard / April Fox4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCarole Jones / Ashley Stone vs Kasey Foster / Casey Hargroder1-6, 0-6
2025-01-13vs Fox & FriendsWon 30
W#1 DoublesLori Moore / Daniel Rowe vs Kasey Foster / Casey Hargroder7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKristin Stumbo / Wilford Blackwell vs John Evanko / Autumn Heseman6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCarole Jones / Rodney Archer vs Ericka Richard / Randall Richard6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 40 & Over Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Rodney Archer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.85
Lori Moore
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.85
Wilford Blackwell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.81
Daniel Rowe
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.51
Pam Whittington
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Carole Jones
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.14
Barri Hoffman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Kristin Stumbo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pam Whittington + Rodney Archer0538% gamesnot enough data
Lori Moore + Daniel Rowe314 matchesnot enough data
Wilford Blackwell + Kristin Stumbo303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rodney Archer
9W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
Lori Moore
39W–33L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
Wilford Blackwell
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Daniel Rowe
7W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
2.81
Pam Whittington
5W–41L career · 1 line in 2025
46%54%<1%
2.51
3
Carole Jones
5W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.48
2.5
Barri Hoffman
0W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
0%99%1%
2.14
Kristin Stumbo
10W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.