Teams

NNM 8.0W HP - Beavis

2022 USTA Adult 55 & Over League - NNM · 8.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-07-07vs NNM 8.0W Lobo Club - StewartWon 20
W#1 DoublesBarbara Emmons / Linda von Boetticher vs Gloria Baca / Bonnie Gray6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDianne Crowley / Suzanne Freinberg vs Rayme Romanik / Lucy Romero7-5, 7-5
2022-07-03vs NNM 8.0W EG - MillerWon 21
W#1 DoublesSuzanne McGinty / Linda von Boetticher vs Cathy Jackson / Sally Harvey6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesBarbara Emmons / Suzanne Freinberg vs Pauline Ziegen / Graciela Butler6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJanet Mednik / Jeanne Arnold vs Marion Carter / Claudia Phillips6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2022-07-02vs NNM 8.0W EG - MillerLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Beavis / Karen Jeffery vs Pauline Ziegen / Graciela Butler2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDonna Steege / Dianne Crowley vs Karen Domenici / Laurie Hofmann1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesVirginia Hollowell / Linda von Boetticher vs Cathy Jackson / Nell Sale7-5, 6-2
2022-06-29vs NNM 8.0W HP - SchwartzLost 12
W#1 DoublesJudy Fleischman / Virginia Hollowell vs Elaine Rising / Karwyn Gustafson6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBarbara Emmons / Suzanne Freinberg vs Amanda Briggs / Jo Ann Erikson2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJanet Mednik / Susan Beavis vs Kathy Swanson / Schoonover Jones2-6, 1-6
2022-06-28vs NNM 8.0W Lobo Club - StewartLost 03
L#1 DoublesLinda von Boetticher / Suzanne McGinty vs Veronica Dorato / Teresa Stewart3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJanet Mednik / Jeanne Arnold vs Renee Baca / Alice Hwang0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Beavis / Karen Jeffery vs Lucy Romero / Rayme Romanik6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2022-06-21vs NNM 8.0W HP - SchwartzLost 03
L#1 DoublesDonna Steege / Dianne Crowley vs Paula Schwartz / Wendy Thomas4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLindsay Ennis / Linda von Boetticher vs Elaine Rising / Susanne Korsan1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Jeffery / Suzanne McGinty vs Rhonda Letz / Karwyn Gustafson4-6, 4-6
2022-06-15vs NNM 8.0W Lobo Club - StewartLost 12
L#1 DoublesKaren Jeffery / Donna Steege vs Teresa Chavez / Bonnie Gray6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJudy Fleischman / Janet Mednik vs Staci Towery / Teresa Kapes1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDianne Crowley / Virginia Hollowell vs Gloria Baca / Rayme Romanik6-4, 6-0
2022-06-12vs NNM 8.0W EG - MillerLost 12
W#1 DoublesJudy Fleischman / Virginia Hollowell vs Claudia Phillips / JoAnn Pomeroy6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJeanne Arnold / Janet Mednik vs Nancy Keeran / Karen Domenici4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDonna Steege / Suzanne McGinty vs Catherine Oppenheimer / Kelly Cain6-7, 6-7
2022-06-11vs NNM 8.0W HP - SchwartzLost 12
L#1 DoublesDonna Steege / Virginia Hollowell vs Elaine Rising / Amanda Briggs1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesJanet Mednik / Jeanne Arnold vs Paula Schwartz / Karwyn Gustafson6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJudy Fleischman / Lindsay Ennis vs Wendy Thomas / Becky Mcclain5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 8.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NNM 8.0W HP - Schwartz63141327237
2NNM 8.0W EG - Miller63161129255
3NNM 8.0W Lobo Club - Stewart45141336261
4NNM 8.0W HP - Beavis27101735260

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Barbara Emmons
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Donna Steege
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.73
Virginia Hollowell
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.66
Linda von Boetticher
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.57
Lindsay Ennis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.56
Dianne Crowley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.42
Susan Beavis
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.28
Suzanne McGinty
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Janet Mednik
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jeanne Arnold
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Judy Fleischman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Karen Jeffery
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Suzanne Freinberg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda von Boetticher + Barbara Emmons6161% games+7.8% vs expected
Linda von Boetticher + Virginia Hollowell71048% games+6.0% vs expected
Susan Beavis + Barbara Emmons7356% games+2.7% vs expected
Janet Mednik + Susan Beavis12850% games+2.4% vs expected
Virginia Hollowell + Dianne Crowley81046% games+1.6% vs expected
Linda von Boetticher + Suzanne McGinty2444% games+1.1% vs expected
Linda von Boetticher + Dianne Crowley1738% games+0.7% vs expected
Susan Beavis + Karen Jeffery12750% games−1.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Barbara Emmons
104W–71L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Donna Steege
20W–45L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Virginia Hollowell
92W–111L career · 5 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Linda von Boetticher
99W–114L career · 5 lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.66
Lindsay Ennis
53W–51L career · 2 lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.57
4
Dianne Crowley
87W–121L career · 4 lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.56
Susan Beavis
83W–125L career · 3 lines in 2022
72%28%<1%
3.42
Suzanne McGinty
56W–111L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
Janet Mednik
29W–31L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jeanne Arnold
16W–40L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Judy Fleischman
55W–45L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Karen Jeffery
47W–71L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Suzanne Freinberg
49W–41L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.