Teams

Neighbors - Beerman Tennis

2021 Polk Adult 18 & Over - Women · 2.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

4 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-05-26vs Crenshaw - Lakeland County ClubWon 10
W#2 DoublesKelly Neighbors / Courtney Philpot vs Courtney Phillips / Hilary Crenshaw6-3, 6-3
2021-05-19vs Polk - Tchipanova/Beerman TennisLost 01
L#1 DoublesTina Marcewicz / Courtney Philpot vs Desiree Tchipanova / Leslie Simmons2-6, 1-6
2021-05-12vs McKendrick - Beerman TennisWon 20
W#1 DoublesTina Marcewicz / Hetal Rajguru vs Melissa Butler / Sabina Elmasri6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBailey Pacheco / Courtney Philpot vs Deborah Joell-Bullock / Diana Smith6-1, 6-2
2021-05-05vs Crenshaw - Lakeland County ClubWon 20
W#1 DoublesHetal Rajguru / Tina Marcewicz vs Wendy Delgado / Jinx Chaney6-0, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBailey Pacheco / Courtney Philpot vs Rachel Hollis / Courtney Phillips6-0, 6-1
2021-04-28vs Polk - Tchipanova/Beerman TennisLost 02
L#1 SinglesCourtney Philpot vs Jihyeon Choe2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTina Marcewicz / Bailey Pacheco vs Dorene Dyer / Clara Copley0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-04-21Lost 01
L#1 SinglesTina Marcewicz vs Brooke Wilson4-6, 3-6
2021-04-14vs Crenshaw - Lakeland County ClubLost 01
L#2 DoublesTina Marcewicz / Courtney Philpot vs Jinx Chaney / Ginny Houghton1-6, 4-6
2021-04-07vs Polk - Tchipanova/Beerman TennisLost 01
L#1 DoublesCourtney Philpot / Tina Marcewicz vs Rose Coulton / Dorene Dyer1-6, 1-6
2021-03-31vs McKendrick - Beerman TennisWon 20
W#1 DoublesCourtney Philpot / Kelly Neighbors vs Brooke Wilson / Sabina Elmasri3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTina Marcewicz / Hetal Rajguru vs Deborah Joell-Bullock / Aimee York6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Tina Marcewicz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.75
Courtney Philpot
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.64
Hetal Rajguru
published 3
2.55
Stacey McCastlain
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Courtney Philpot + Tina Marcewicz192249% games+15.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Tina Marcewicz
110W–80L career · 8 lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
2.87
3
Courtney Philpot
79W–74L career · 8 lines in 2021
3%95%2%
2.75
3
Hetal Rajguru
1W–8L career · no lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
2.64
Stacey McCastlain
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
35%65%<1%
2.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.