Teams

MC GOLD

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT

6 players · average NTRP 2.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-07vs NJ GOLDWon 10
W#1 DoublesSamantha Spiwak / Kelly Wilson vs Meghan Disch / Katy Thompson6-1, 7-5
2023-09-06vs GR BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesTara Cronin / Kelly Sengenberger vs Ally MacDougall / Kayley Sudac4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-08-24vs BCST REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesTara Cronin / Kelly Sengenberger vs Tracy Rotter / Ann Symalla6-2, 6-1
2023-08-17vs KC-RH TEALLost 01
L#1 DoublesKelly Sengenberger / Tara Cronin vs Sandra Copenhaver / Christine Jacquet0-6, 3-6
2023-08-10vs RHCC PURPLEWon 10
W#1 DoublesSamantha Spiwak / Tara Cronin vs Charlotte Smith / Jennifer Kos6-4, 6-3
2023-08-03vs NJ GOLDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSamantha Spiwak / Kelly Wilson vs Katy Thompson / Meghan Disch6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAmy Hank / Kelly Sengenberger vs Lesley Kuhl / McKenzie Grace7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2023-07-27vs GR BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesSamantha Spiwak / Kelly Wilson vs Ally MacDougall / Kayley Sudac6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKelly Sengenberger / Tara Cronin vs Chloe Conaway / Gail Martin6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.21 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Amy Hank
published 3
2.44
Ashley Sakker
published 3
2.33
Jillian Clark
published
2.16
Tara Cronin
published
2.09
Samantha Spiwak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.00
Kelly Sengenberger
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jillian Clark + Amy Hank9457% games+6.7% vs expected
Tara Cronin + Kelly Sengenberger7348% games−0.5% vs expected
Samantha Spiwak + Kelly Sengenberger044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Amy Hank
19W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Ashley Sakker
14W–14L career · no lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
2.44
Jillian Clark
34W–18L career · no lines in 2023
0%88%12%
2.33
Tara Cronin
13W–12L career · no lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.16
2.5
Samantha Spiwak
44W–54L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.09
2.5
Kelly Sengenberger
21W–83L career · 5 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.