Teams

BHSC- Weck

2025 Charlottesville Mixed 40 & Over · Charlottesville Mixed 40 & Over 9.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.36 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-07-11vs ACAC- ParadaLost 01
L#2 DoublesLauren Suggs / Mark Raffinan vs Jordan Barr / Joyce Steed2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-06-28Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Nolasco / Mark Raffinan vs Erin Waters / Naveen Chennupati0-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Mixed 40 & Over 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.22 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Reid Phillips
published
4.41
Linda Walker
published 4.5
4.40
Todd Sechser
published
Amy Nolasco
published 4.5
Daniel Carlson
published 4.5
4.23
Brandon Schartz
published 4.5
4.21
Mark Raffinan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.17
Wescott Blemker
published
4.06
Lauren Suggs
published
4.04
Thomas Weck
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
4.02
Howell Fendley
published 4
Jennie Chiu
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Reid Phillips
11W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
4.43
4.5
Linda Walker
48W–35L career · type S · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
4.41
Todd Sechser
14W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
4.40
4.5
Amy Nolasco
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Daniel Carlson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Brandon Schartz
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Mark Raffinan
72W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
4.21
Wescott Blemker
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
4.17
Lauren Suggs
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
4.06
4
Thomas Weck
69W–44L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%39%61%
4.04
4
Howell Fendley
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
4.02
Jennie Chiu
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.