Teams

Lanc CC - Jemison/Shand

2025 Central Penn Ladies Day League · 5.0 Division - Fall

11 players · average NTRP 2.83 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-11-01vs Hempfield - Woods-KellyWon 10
W#1 DoublesStacey Brubaker / Ashley Lundy vs Linda Rasmuson / Nancy Swank6-1, 6-3
2024-10-11vs Hempfield - Woods-KellyWon 10
W#1 DoublesAshley Lundy / Christie Mckenzie vs Flo Moran / Kimberly Lent6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 Division - Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.49 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Ashley Lundy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.48
Krista Chambers
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.48
Stacey Brubaker
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.47
Tara Kinney
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.46
Christina Jemison
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.43
Alexandra Shand
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.40
Lauren Stadel
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.35
Persila Mertz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.33
Kerrie Snavely
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Amanda Brightbill
published 2.5
Renae Horan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacey Brubaker + Krista Chambers3253% games−1.5% vs expected
Stacey Brubaker + Christina Jemison3349% games−2.4% vs expected
Stacey Brubaker + Alexandra Shand0532% gamesnot enough data
Alexandra Shand + Krista Chambers044 matchesnot enough data
Stacey Brubaker + Ashley Lundy303 matchesnot enough data
Christina Jemison + Krista Chambers123 matchesnot enough data
Alexandra Shand + Persila Mertz123 matchesnot enough data
Tara Kinney + Renae Horan033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ashley Lundy
19W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Krista Chambers
24W–23L career · 5 lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.48
3
Stacey Brubaker
27W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.48
Tara Kinney
11W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%60%40%
2.47
3
Christina Jemison
25W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.46
2.5
Alexandra Shand
14W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%72%28%
2.43
Lauren Stadel
13W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%77%23%
2.40
Persila Mertz
10W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%87%13%
2.35
Kerrie Snavely
9W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%91%9%
2.33
2.5
Amanda Brightbill
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Renae Horan
4W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.