Teams

PTC BLUE

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-22vs EM REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesNaomi Fisher / Kristin Linhardt vs Susan Stone / Ruth Rohs6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesChristina Good vs Kate Bangs6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesPenny Malloy / Lou Ann Witter vs Mary Mathis / Melissa Zink1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMaryBeth Doerr / Melody Sattizahn vs Christy Brant / Andrea Horan2-6, 6-7
2021-07-15vs CHCC BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesKyle Davis / Kristin Linhardt vs Gina Carbone Fenton / Heather Benes1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesShannon Kleinbach vs Cindy Wells6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesPenny Malloy / Lou Ann Witter vs Brooke Simpson / Liz Arnold5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSHERI ZASOWSKI / MaryBeth Doerr vs Meredith Calkins / Julie Buckley2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2021-07-08vs CACM BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesChristina Good / Shannon Kleinbach vs Julie Boes / Kristen Corcoran6-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesNaomi Fisher vs Cindy Lee6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSarah Crow / Melody Sattizahn vs Kelly Fitz / BethAnn Parsons4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJyll Lilly / Kyle Davis vs Heather Johnson / Leslie Rich1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-07-01vs GAC BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesChristina Good / Shannon Kleinbach vs Ann Baer / Carla Kenny2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesNaomi Fisher vs Tamara Pollack6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJyll Lilly / MaryBeth Doerr vs Debra Benge / Tracy Powers1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSarah Crow / Melody Sattizahn vs Jennifer Elliott / Laura Thomson7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2021-06-24vs CACM BLACKLost 13
L#1 DoublesSarah Crow / MaryBeth Doerr vs Linda Houlihan / Dawn Phillips3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesNaomi Fisher vs Karen Ruwe6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPenny Malloy / Lou Ann Witter vs Tandy Dilworth / Midori Clark2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesSHERI ZASOWSKI / Jyll Lilly vs Lise Uhrich / Stephanie Slaybaugh0-6, 5-7
2021-06-17vs SSH BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesNaomi Fisher / Jeanne Kerr vs Stacey Miller / Cherie Weren6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesShannon Kleinbach vs Corinne Flemister2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSarah Crow / Kyle Davis vs Kathy Hoskins / Lisa Chirico7-6, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMaryBeth Doerr / Melody Sattizahn vs Lynsey Orr / Molly Maxwell1-6, 0-6
2021-06-10vs GCC BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesChristina Good / Jeanne Kerr vs Andrea Howland - Cobb / Rima Hea4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSarah Crow vs Ronit Hicks1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJyll Lilly / SHERI ZASOWSKI vs Andrea Carrington / Min Baglieri0-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesBrooke Leer / Shannon Kleinbach vs Amy Reilly / Brooke Beasley6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Naomi Fisher
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.27
Sarah Crow
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.26
Erika Shorter
published 3.5
3.26
Shannon Kleinbach
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.17
Christina Good
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.14
Melody Sattizahn
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.71
Kristin Linhardt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
MaryBeth Doerr
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.58
Kyle Davis
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Brooke Leer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jeanne Kerr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jyll Lilly
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Lou Ann Witter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Crow + Erika Shorter12657% games+4.3% vs expected
Erika Shorter + Shannon Kleinbach23459% games+4.0% vs expected
Sarah Crow + Shannon Kleinbach9357% games+2.7% vs expected
Melody Sattizahn + MaryBeth Doerr2541% games+2.5% vs expected
Kyle Davis + Melody Sattizahn3541% games+1.8% vs expected
Christina Good + Shannon Kleinbach1446% games−1.0% vs expected
Kyle Davis + Kristin Linhardt93142% games−4.0% vs expected
Kyle Davis + MaryBeth Doerr033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Naomi Fisher
58W–19L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%90%10%
3.33
Sarah Crow
41W–31L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Erika Shorter
77W–46L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Shannon Kleinbach
71W–41L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Christina Good
30W–58L career · type A · 4 lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Melody Sattizahn
78W–121L career · 4 lines in 2021
13%86%<1%
3.14
Kristin Linhardt
19W–45L career · 2 lines in 2021
5%93%1%
2.71
MaryBeth Doerr
48W–96L career · 5 lines in 2021
10%90%1%
2.67
Kyle Davis
22W–63L career · 3 lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
2.58
Brooke Leer
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Jeanne Kerr
3W–11L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jyll Lilly
4W–13L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lou Ann Witter
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.