Teams

Ryan

2026 KS 40 & Over Adult Indoor League · 4.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP / KANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-28vs KS/Zrubek/40&Over4.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesJulie Ryan / Tahnee Maples vs Ana Salgado / Christy Hancock5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesHildegard McManus / Teresa Oneal vs Valerie Glotzbach / Rebekah Berkley3-6, 3-6
2026-05-28vs KS/Zrubek/40&Over4.5WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJulie Ryan / Tahnee Maples vs Christy Hancock / Ana Salgado6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesHildegard McManus / Teresa Oneal vs Valerie Glotzbach / Rebekah Berkley1-6, 1-6
2026-05-23vs KS/Zrubek/40&Over4.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesHildegard McManus / Julie Ryan vs Diane Werner / Gail Browning2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKathy Schulte / Susan Wilson vs Michelle Bettis / Heather Fay3-6, 3-6
2026-05-23vs KS/Zrubek/40&Over4.5WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKathy Schulte / Susan Wilson vs Diane Werner / Gail Browning6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJulie Ryan / Hildegard McManus vs Michelle Bettis / Heather Fay2-6, 2-6
2026-05-16vs KS/Zrubek/40&Over4.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesTahnee Maples / Kathy Schulte vs Sheree Sander / Carolyn Huffman1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Wilson / Lesli WongToubassi vs Deborah Zrubek / Gail Browning4-6, 4-6
2026-05-16vs KS/Zrubek/40&Over4.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesKathy Schulte / Tahnee Maples vs Deborah Zrubek / Gail Browning0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Wilson / Lesli WongToubassi vs Sheree Sander / Carolyn Huffman4-6, 4-6
2026-04-18vs KS/Zrubek/40&Over4.5WSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJulie Ryan / Tahnee Maples vs Deborah Zrubek / Janice Price6-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesKathy Schulte / Kristin Conrad vs Rachel Seitz / Ana Salgado6-3, 6-3
2026-04-18vs KS/Zrubek/40&Over4.5WSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKathy Schulte / Kristin Conrad vs Deborah Zrubek / Janice Price1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJulie Ryan / Tahnee Maples vs Rachel Seitz / Ana Salgado6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Julie Ryan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.79
Kathy Schulte
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.70
Kristin Conrad
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.53
Teresa Oneal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Tahnee Maples
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
3.35
Lesli WongToubassi
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.26
Hildegard McManus
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Kristine Onofrio
published
Susan Wilson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hildegard McManus + Teresa Oneal41343% games+1.9% vs expected
Tahnee Maples + Julie Ryan224 matchesnot enough data
Kristin Conrad + Tahnee Maples123 matchesnot enough data
Kristin Conrad + Kathy Schulte123 matchesnot enough data
Tahnee Maples + Lesli WongToubassi123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Ryan
16W–27L career · 6 lines in 2026
85%15%<1%
3.85
Kathy Schulte
5W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
93%7%<1%
3.79
Kristin Conrad
28W–37L career · 2 lines in 2026
98%2%<1%
3.70
Teresa Oneal
25W–50L career · 2 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.53
Tahnee Maples
44W–48L career · 13 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
3.47
Lesli WongToubassi
38W–80L career · 7 lines in 2026
86%14%<1%
3.35
Hildegard McManus
42W–75L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.26
Kristine Onofrio
12W–19L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Wilson
62W–50L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.