Teams

GEPTA/18&overMX/4.5/Friedl/EPTC#3

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA MIXED 18 & OVER LEAGUE

14 players · average NTRP 4.40 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings3 teams · 2026 USA MIXED 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Gandarilla/18&over/4.5MX8021310144
2GEPTA/18&overMX/4.5/Quevedo/EPTC#135101432235
3GEPTA/18&overMX/4.5/Friedl/EPTC#31742041276

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.97 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Alex Anoveros
usually #3 Doubles 64%, also #1 Doubles 21% · published 4.5
Amber Brightly
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.08
Chuck Duarte
usually #1 Doubles 62%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published 4.5
4.00
Claudia Calderon
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.50
Brian Hass
usually #1 Singles 36%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published 4
Hope Perez
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
James Marquez Williams
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Jared Nieman
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Leila Lobato
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
Marco Gonzalez Friedl
usually #3 Doubles 34%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
MarieJosee Lefebvre
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Melissa Hufft
usually #1 Doubles 45%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Susana Elias
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Wilfredo Fonseca
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

MarieJosee Lefebvre + Susana Elias6460% games+4.5% vs expected
Hope Perez + MarieJosee Lefebvre121150% games+2.6% vs expected
Leila Lobato + Claudia Calderon3548% gamesnot enough data
Susana Elias + Claudia Calderon2350% gamesnot enough data
Alex Anoveros + Marco Gonzalez Friedl213 matchesnot enough data
Leila Lobato + Susana Elias123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alex Anoveros
42W–43L career · 14 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
4.28
4.5
Amber Brightly
17W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Chuck Duarte
79W–43L career · 13 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
4.08
4.5
Claudia Calderon
41W–57L career · 15 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
4.00
4
Brian Hass
101W–59L career · 10 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.50
Hope Perez
40W–44L career · 18 lines in 2026
not enough data
James Marquez Williams
7W–5L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jared Nieman
17W–15L career · 10 lines in 2026
not enough data
Leila Lobato
65W–61L career · 28 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marco Gonzalez Friedl
83W–113L career · 31 lines in 2026
not enough data
MarieJosee Lefebvre
100W–76L career · 21 lines in 2026
not enough data
Melissa Hufft
98W–71L career · 20 lines in 2026
not enough data
Susana Elias
108W–65L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Wilfredo Fonseca
47W–41L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.