Teams

WI Combo 7.5W (Day) GML FLAC Schmidt

2025 WI Combo 7.5 Daytime · WI Combo 7.5 Women (Day)

11 players · average NTRP 3.72 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
L#1 DoublesKathy Kort / Peggy Whitmer vs Heidi Wagner / Kellie Anderson1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesStacee Busateri / Karen Papcke vs Diane Harmening / Mary Underhill2-6, 1-6
2025-10-13vs WI Combo 7.5W (Day) GML WAC AbholdLost 03
L#1 DoublesJulie Haeger / Karen Papcke vs Jodie Palmisano / Susan Miller6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJulee Scherrer / Tracy Huml vs Micky Abhold / Jennifer McCausland3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSusan Schmidt / Sam Gardner vs Sarah Deppisch / Terri Martin1-6, 2-6
2025-10-06vs WI Combo 7.5W (Day) PVTC LamboWon 21
W#1 DoublesKathy Kort / Julie Haeger vs Janet Ericson / Michelle Gruber4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTracy Huml / Elizabeth Quigley vs Annette Neinas / Alisa Lambo7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKaren Morand / Sam Gardner vs Barb Seidl / Mary E Timm7-5, 6-4
L#1 DoublesKaren Morand / Karen Papcke vs Heidi Wagner / Jeanne Main3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJulee Scherrer / Stacee Busateri vs Lisa Ellegard / Michelle Godden5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKristine Jurczyk / Kathy Kort vs Karen Lucey / Sandra Wood6-3, 6-4
L#1 DoublesJulie Haeger / Karen Papcke vs Susan Lutz / Micky Abhold1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesJulee Scherrer / Stacee Busateri vs Jennifer McCausland / Mary Berg7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKristine Jurczyk / Tracy Huml vs Julie Wolf / Terri Martin7-5, 6-1
2025-09-15Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJulee Scherrer / Karen Papcke vs Michelle Gruber / Yvette Roller5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Schmidt / Kathy Kort vs Bonnie Johnson / Olga Konrath7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSam Gardner / Tracy Huml vs Barb Seidl / Karen Schmidt4-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesJulie Haeger / Karen Papcke vs Joyce Koker / Joyce Coury5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Schmidt / Peggy Whitmer vs Lisa Ellegard / Kellie Anderson1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJulee Scherrer / Tracy Huml vs Diane Harmening / Sandra Wood3-6, 1-6
2025-08-25vs WI Combo 7.5W (Day) GML WAC AbholdSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJulee Scherrer / Karen Papcke vs Micky Abhold / Susan Lutz6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Quigley / Susan Schmidt vs Susan Miller / Julie Wolf6-4, 6-4
2025-08-18vs WI Combo 7.5W (Day) PVTC LamboWon 21
W#1 DoublesJulie Haeger / Karen Papcke vs Janet Ericson / Michelle Gruber6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPeggy Whitmer / Kathy Kort vs Olga Konrath / Alisa Lambo7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesTracy Huml / Susan Schmidt vs Barb Seidl / Mary E Timm1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WI Combo 7.5 Women (Day) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Karen Morand
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.88
Kristine Jurczyk
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.71
Elizabeth Quigley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
Julee Scherrer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.39
Julie Haeger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Stacee Busateri
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Kathy Kort
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.15
Peggy Whitmer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Karen Papcke
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3
3.01
Tracy Huml
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.84
Sam Gardner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peggy Whitmer + Kathy Kort15955% games+2.5% vs expected
Karen Papcke + Julee Scherrer7553% games−3.7% vs expected
Sam Gardner + Tracy Huml2441% gamesnot enough data
Karen Papcke + Stacee Busateri4262% gamesnot enough data
Kathy Kort + Stacee Busateri303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Karen Morand
65W–54L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
4.13
4.5
Kristine Jurczyk
327W–126L career · 2 lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
3.88
Elizabeth Quigley
90W–60L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Julee Scherrer
30W–26L career · 6 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
3.5
Julie Haeger
61W–38L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Stacee Busateri
93W–55L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Kathy Kort
76W–49L career · 5 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Peggy Whitmer
18W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.15
3
Karen Papcke
84W–53L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.12
3.5
Tracy Huml
19W–27L career · 6 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.01
Sam Gardner
13W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.84

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.