Teams

LA - Slice Girls

2024 SoCal Doubles - LA · LA - Women 3.5

6 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-11-16vs LA - MountainGate GatorsWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarguerite Harrop / Soyeon Kim vs Stephanie Atkinson / Christine Steele6-4, 6-1
2024-11-02vs LA - Shadow's AcesSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMeriem Romeo / Kinsey Ball vs Anna Hubbard / Stephanie Meyer6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMarguerite Harrop / Tamara Treu vs Allison Langus / Susan Warner6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-10-27vs LA - Downtown Aces 3.5Won 20
W#2 DoublesKinsey Ball / Veronika Zherdeva vs Lilly Shuton / Theresa Sterling6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMarguerite Harrop / Genevieve MacNamara vs Kat Kim / Wendy Waller6-1, 6-0
2024-10-20vs LA - Cheviot HillsWon 20
W#1 DoublesJulie Warshaw / Marguerite Harrop vs Hannah Shuman / Elyse Wolin6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKinsey Ball / Meriem Romeo vs Spencer Schlesinger / Dorie Speer6-1, 6-2
2024-10-13vs LA - Victorious SecretWon 20
W#2 DoublesRina Matsuoka / Veronika Zherdeva vs Rebecca Carpenter / Karen Minikes6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKinsey Ball / Meriem Romeo vs Vanessa Bustillos / Lydia Pelosi5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2024-09-29vs LA - Canyon Coyotes 3.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMarguerite Harrop / Veronika Zherdeva vs Melanie Minichino / Shelly Cohen6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRina Matsuoka / Susan Lee vs Graciela Gutierrez / Jean Kim2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKinsey Ball / Camila Hatkoff vs Eriana Blankinship / Caroline Harris6-1, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Marguerite Harrop
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.47
Julie Warshaw
published
3.38
Veronika Zherdeva
published
3.29
Rina Matsuoka
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Kinsey Ball
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.73
Genevieve MacNamara
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rina Matsuoka + Marguerite Harrop2346% gamesnot enough data
Kinsey Ball + Rina Matsuoka123 matchesnot enough data
Veronika Zherdeva + Rina Matsuoka213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Marguerite Harrop
45W–25L career · 5 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.64
Julie Warshaw
10W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.47
Veronika Zherdeva
23W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Rina Matsuoka
44W–47L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
Kinsey Ball
23W–24L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Genevieve MacNamara
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.