Teams

Midtown/Cofino

2026 Broward Adult 18 & Over - Spring Night · 4.5 Adult 18 & Over Men

18 players · average NTRP 4.43 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-09vs Broward//MarcanoLost 05
L#1 DoublesAntonio Macias Valdes / Pipo Torrellas vs Patricio Casali / William Pacanins4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesLee Neidorf vs Luis Soto4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesChase Grainger / Nick Boros vs RICARDO GIRON / Miguel Tortolero4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesFernando caballero vs Martin Mesia4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRoberto Ribas / Andres Cepeda vs Victor Yegres / Daniel Delgado3-6, 2-6
2026-06-01Won 10
W#2 SinglesJuan Pablo Cofino vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-05-21vs Broward/Valencia/CadenaLost 23
L#1 DoublesNick Boros / Gustavo Rodriguez vs Francisco Valencia / Ramon Hudec2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesFernando caballero vs Derk de Vries6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJuan Pablo Cofino / Luis Moreno vs Jack Komar / Arturo Carrasco0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesSantiago Carranza vs Matthew Kramer6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKyle Stump / Chase Grainger vs Segundo Decotto / Bruce Kurtz6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2026-05-14vs C/Piccolo/AndersonWon 41
W#1 DoublesFernando caballero / Pipo Torrellas vs Adam Hendry / Antonio Marcelin6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAndres Cepeda vs Kevin Phuong Nguyen2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDaniel Caminata / GUILLERMO TORRELLAS vs Daniel Dames / Carlos Miranda6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesSantiago Carranza vs Alan Matheus6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLuis Moreno / Antonio Macias Valdes vs Simon Palacios / Danilo Gonzalez6-1, 6-3
2026-04-30vs SwimRacquet/SerbanescuWon 32
L#1 DoublesLee Neidorf / Daniel Lombardo vs Isaac Smith / Jason Rothstein3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesChase Grainger vs Riley Mahoney2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesAntonio Macias Valdes / GUILLERMO TORRELLAS vs Skye Waterman / Greg Brusey7-6, 6-4
W#2 SinglesJuan Pablo Cofino vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesEfrain Soler / Gustavo Rodriguez vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-04-23vs Broward//MarcanoLost 05
L#1 DoublesAntonio Macias Valdes / Daniel Caminata vs Hugo Moreno / Victor Yegres4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesChase Grainger vs Luis Soto4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLuis Moreno / Daniel Lombardo vs Casali Ignacio / Inigo Ojer7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesSantiago Carranza vs Martin Mesia5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesGUILLERMO TORRELLAS / Pipo Torrellas vs Patricio Casali / JORGE YEGRES6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2026-04-16vs Broward/Valencia/CadenaWon 32
W#1 DoublesLuis Moreno / Lee Neidorf vs Tedd Rosinsky / Pawel Andrzejewski7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSantiago Carranza vs Jack Komar4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDaniel Caminata / GUILLERMO TORRELLAS vs Francisco Valencia / Ramon Hudec3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 SinglesChase Grainger vs Matthew Kramer6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRoberto Ribas / Efrain Soler vs Segundo Decotto / Bruce Kurtz4-6, 1-6
2026-04-09vs C/Piccolo/AndersonWon 50
W#1 DoublesPipo Torrellas / GUILLERMO TORRELLAS vs Carlos Miranda / Regulo Araujo6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesChase Grainger vs Alan Matheus6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAntonio Macias Valdes / Daniel Caminata vs Daniel Dames / Brendan Moser6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesSantiago Carranza vs Kevin Phuong Nguyen6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDaniel Lombardo / Luis Moreno vs Antonio Marcelin / Michael Kattan6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 4.5 Adult 18 & Over Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Broward//Marcano6129620301
2Broward/Valencia/Cadena52201536297
3Midtown/Cofino43171838306
4SwimRacquet/Serbanescu1371327212
5C/Piccolo/Anderson0753061383

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.11 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Santiago Carranza
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
4.37
Chase Grainger
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 4.5
4.37
GUILLERMO TORRELLAS
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.30
Pipo Torrellas
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.22
Juan Pablo Cofino
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.20
Antonio Macias Valdes
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.19
Efrain Soler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.18
Daniel Caminata
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.17
Lee Neidorf
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
4.10
Javier Cavanna
published
4.08
Daniel Lombardo
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.08
Nick Boros
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.06
Fernando caballero
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.81
Luis Moreno
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.80
Gustavo Rodriguez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Andres Cepeda
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.76
Roberto Ribas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kyle Stump
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Antonio Macias Valdes + Juan Pablo Cofino8652% games+7.3% vs expected
Pipo Torrellas + GUILLERMO TORRELLAS4162% games+7.2% vs expected
Antonio Macias Valdes + GUILLERMO TORRELLAS4261% gamesnot enough data
Pipo Torrellas + Antonio Macias Valdes044 matchesnot enough data
Efrain Soler + Juan Pablo Cofino213 matchesnot enough data
GUILLERMO TORRELLAS + Daniel Caminata123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Santiago Carranza
5W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
4.38
4.5
Chase Grainger
5W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
4.37
4.5
GUILLERMO TORRELLAS
173W–67L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
4.37
Pipo Torrellas
175W–87L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
4.30
4.5
Juan Pablo Cofino
66W–76L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Antonio Macias Valdes
283W–144L career · 5 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
4.20
Efrain Soler
41W–54L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
4.19
4.5
Daniel Caminata
9W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
4.18
Lee Neidorf
13W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%12%88%
4.17
Javier Cavanna
1W–5L career · no lines in 2026
24%75%<1%
4.10
4.5
Daniel Lombardo
1W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
4.08
Nick Boros
0W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
27%72%<1%
4.08
Fernando caballero
5W–1L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
4.06
Luis Moreno
5W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
91%9%<1%
3.81
Gustavo Rodriguez
0W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
93%7%<1%
3.80
4
Andres Cepeda
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
Roberto Ribas
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.76
Kyle Stump
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.