Teams

John's Team

2023 Springfield Adult Flex Leagues · Mixed Multi-Level Flex League

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSOURI

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-03-05vs Josh's TeamLost 12
L#1 DoublesDoug Erb / Allison Steiner vs Daniel Bennett / Sharon Bennett1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJohn Crull / Caroline Farouki vs Josh Bartram / Mona Palmer7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L#4 DoublesRodney Glass / Laura Greene-Johnson vs Curtis Schnur / Karen Griffin3-6, 2-6
2023-02-19vs Josh's TeamLost 13
W#1 DoublesRobert Sheets / Allison Steiner vs Nathan Connell / Tami Murphy7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAustin Propst / Leslie Echols vs Curtis Schnur / Sharon Bennett0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Crull / Laura Greene-Johnson vs Josh Bartram / Mona Palmer4-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesRodney Glass / Sandra Sanders vs Juan Cabrera / Kelly Hayes2-6, 0-6
2023-02-05vs Josh's TeamLost 13
L#1 DoublesDoug Erb / Allison Steiner vs Daniel Bennett / Sharon Bennett6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAustin Propst / Patricia Musick vs Curtis Schnur / Karen Griffin6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJohn Crull / Leslie Echols vs Luke Bowling / Tami Murphy3-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesArbindra Rimal / Sandra Sanders vs Juan Cabrera / Kelly Hayes3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Mixed Multi-Level Flex League
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Josh's Team3084983
2John's Team033919130

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Robert Sheets
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Allison Steiner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Leslie Echols
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.48
Laura Greene-Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
3.35
Doug Erb
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Sandra Sanders
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Austin Propst
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Arbindra Rimal
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3
Caroline Farouki
published
John Crull
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Patricia Musick
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Rodney Glass
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robert Sheets
14W–2L career · 1 line in 2023
30%70%<1%
4.07
4
Allison Steiner
17W–21L career · 3 lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.65
Leslie Echols
111W–71L career · 6 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
Laura Greene-Johnson
6W–16L career · 2 lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
3.48
3.5
Doug Erb
7W–15L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.35
Sandra Sanders
49W–30L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Austin Propst
34W–25L career · 2 lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.16
3
Arbindra Rimal
2W–7L career · type S · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Caroline Farouki
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
John Crull
9W–12L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Patricia Musick
67W–15L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Rodney Glass
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.