Teams

Flexner/Ammann DAY

2025 SOUTH EAST TENNIS ADULT 65 & OVER · 3.5 women

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-04vs CAMPBELL DAY/LATELost 03
L#1 DoublesCarol Scott / Karen Heiser vs Kim Byrd / Barbara Pennington1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDiane Alleborn / Cheryl Matsche vs Rhonda VanSpeybroeck / Elizabeth King5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMarty Patterson / Terry Zyga vs Judy Rulis / Shirley Carlyle1-6, 2-6
2025-03-16vs CAMPBELL DAY/LATELost 03
L#1 DoublesPamela Tharrington / Lisa Williamson vs Donna Jaeckel / Barbara Pennington2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCheryl Matsche / Carol Scott vs Elizabeth King / Rhonda VanSpeybroeck1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJanice Ammann / Karen Heiser vs Shirley Carlyle / Judy Rulis3-6, 1-6
2025-02-25vs CAMPBELL DAY/LATELost 12
L#1 DoublesPamela Tharrington / Lisa Williamson vs Kim Byrd / Barbara Pennington0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDiane Alleborn / Cheryl Matsche vs Gail Landon / Lena White1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesBarbara Movelle / Carol Scott vs Shirley Carlyle / June Highfill4-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Pamela Tharrington
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Diane Alleborn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Karen Wall
published
3.19
Cheryl Matsche
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.14
Karen Heiser
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.11
3.02
Barbara Movelle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Janice Ammann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jenine Flexner
published
Marty Patterson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Terry Zyga
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pamela Tharrington
11W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
3.40
3.5
Diane Alleborn
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Karen Wall
11W–13L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Cheryl Matsche
10W–13L career · 6 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Karen Heiser
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.14
Jacqueline Travagliante
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
3
Barbara Movelle
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
Janice Ammann
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jenine Flexner
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Marty Patterson
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Terry Zyga
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.