Teams

Young - Hidden Dunes

2026 OWB Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0 Mixed 40 & Over

9 players · average NTRP 2.75 / REGION_1

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-04-06vs OWB/GaviganWon 21
W#1 DoublesJulie Campbell / James Campbell vs Janet Guehl / Seth Hammer6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBlake Young / Deanna Young vs Robert Weil / Lindy Wood6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMary Pringle / Ryan Harris vs Meg Castleberry / Casey Castleberry4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-03-30vs Halstead - Camp CreekLost 12
W#1 DoublesJames Campbell / Julie Campbell vs Andy Hernandez / Jodi Pratt2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRyan Harris / Mary Pringle vs Brock Halstead / Carrie Halstead3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJames Azzolini / Rachel Azzolini vs Amanda Edwards / Justin Goodman1-6, 1-6
2026-03-24vs OWB/GaviganLost 02
L#1 DoublesDeanna Young / Blake Young vs Jennifer Bekkers / Matthew Giles6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesYana Morgan / Mark Rowe vs LeAnne Shumate / Mike Gavigan2-6, 0-6
2026-03-10vs Halstead - Camp CreekWon 21
W#1 DoublesJulie Campbell / James Campbell vs Jodi Pratt / Gary Ditmore3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDeanna Young / Blake Young vs Jon Ward / Amanda Edwards7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesRyan Harris / Yana Morgan vs James Sater / Peggy Ditmore4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Deanna Young
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.98
Julie Campbell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Yana Morgan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.81
Blake Young
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
James Azzolini
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mark Rowe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Pringle
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Rachel Azzolini
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Shellie Rowe
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deanna Young + Blake Young8167% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Deanna Young
17W–1L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
Julie Campbell
18W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
2.98
Yana Morgan
15W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
2.5
Blake Young
8W–1L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%1%99%
2.81
James Azzolini
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Mark Rowe
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Mary Pringle
59W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rachel Azzolini
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Shellie Rowe
2W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.