Teams

PENINSULA GCC 18AM4.0A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 4.0

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-05-22vs BAY CLUB REDWOOD SHORES 18AM4.0BWon 41
W#1 DoublesTal Simon / Andrew Benson vs Eric Kuchherzki / Robert Weedn6-0, 7-5
W#1 SinglesChristopher Wu vs Steve Renaker6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMichael Njo / Peter Isaacson vs Marc Manuel / Josh Levenberg6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 SinglesRyan Schaefer vs Ming Tang2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAndy Ballard / Matt Bugna vs Donald Kung / Collin Blakely6-2, 6-2
2025-05-07vs BAY CLUB REDWOOD SHORES 18AM4.0BWon 21
W#1 DoublesAndy Ballard / Jonathan Tang vs Marc Manuel / Steve Renaker6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichael Njo / Mason Ford vs Ming Tang / Yisong Ye3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesChristopher Wu vs Thomas Petrillo6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Christopher Wu
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
4.00
Jonathan Tang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.96
Matt Bugna
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.94
Tal Simon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Michael Breyer
published
Alex Harper
published 4
Andrew Benson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Andy Ballard
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.56
John Bruel
published
3.53
Andrew McCabe
published 4
3.51
Neil Schaefer
published
3.50
Peter Isaacson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Mason Ford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Andrew Cattano
published 4
Michael Njo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Ryan Schaefer
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christopher Wu
10W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
4.01
Jonathan Tang
12W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%50%50%
4.00
Matt Bugna
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.96
Tal Simon
8W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.94
Michael Breyer
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Alex Harper
no matches on record · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Andrew Benson
3W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4
Andy Ballard
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
John Bruel
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.56
4
Andrew McCabe
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.53
Neil Schaefer
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.51
Peter Isaacson
0W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.50
Mason Ford
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
4
Andrew Cattano
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
3.32
Michael Njo
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ryan Schaefer
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.