Teams

KGilreath

2022 Capital Summer 40 & Over Singles League · 3.0 women

7 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-23vs BLeippe 3.0Won 10
W#1 SinglesHolly Atkinson vs Marie Gelston6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2022-07-16vs BLeippe 3.0Split 11
L#1 SinglesErin Wynia vs Amanda Mueller0-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesHolly Atkinson vs Marie Gelston6-3, 6-2
2022-07-09vs BLeippe 3.0Lost 02
L#1 SinglesJamie McCallum vs Jennifer Wolborsky6-7, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 SinglesErin Wynia vs Lisa Bakowski2-6, 3-6
2022-06-25Split 11
L#2 SinglesErin Wynia vs Amanda Mueller1-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesJamie McCallum vs Angela Nesius7-5, 6-2
2022-06-18vs BLeippe 3.0Split 11
W#1 SinglesHolly Atkinson vs Frauke Mirenda6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesJamie McCallum vs Lisa Bakowski5-7, 4-6
2022-06-11vs BLeippe 3.0Won 10
W#3 SinglesErin Wynia vs Allison Dugan6-0, 6-1
2022-06-06vs BLeippe 3.0Split 11
L#1 SinglesJamie McCallum vs Amanda Mueller1-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesHolly Atkinson vs Wendy Sielaty6-0, 2-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Julie Dougherty
published
3.39
Erin Wynia
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.11
Holly Atkinson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.03
Rossi Evans
published 3
2.99
Jamie McCallum
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.99
Michelle Mills
published
2.71
Kristi Gilreath
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jamie McCallum + Rossi Evans10358% games+19.2% vs expected
Jamie McCallum + Holly Atkinson5261% gamesnot enough data
Jamie McCallum + Erin Wynia1644% gamesnot enough data
Holly Atkinson + Rossi Evans5258% gamesnot enough data
Jamie McCallum + Michelle Mills2353% gamesnot enough data
Kristi Gilreath + Jamie McCallum314 matchesnot enough data
Holly Atkinson + Erin Wynia224 matchesnot enough data
Julie Dougherty + Erin Wynia224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Dougherty
49W–19L career · no lines in 2022
<1%27%73%
3.58
3.5
Erin Wynia
185W–127L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%80%19%
3.39
3.5
Holly Atkinson
253W–179L career · 4 lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.11
3
Rossi Evans
142W–87L career · no lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Jamie McCallum
146W–115L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
2.99
Michelle Mills
16W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%54%46%
2.99
Kristi Gilreath
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
2.71

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.