Teams

Berry

2025 Tri-Level 18 & Over-SW · Women 4.0, 3.5, 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.67 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-07-28Won 10
W#2 DoublesJulianna Porter / Taylor Murray vs Beth Smith / Lindsey Byrd6-4, 6-3
2025-07-22vs Weekley Tri-Level 2025Won 10
W#2 DoublesCindy Foster / Katie Cole vs Taylor Key / Robin Kuntz6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2025-07-01vs Lowery TeamWon 10
W#2 DoublesChristy Rounsaville / Katie Cole vs Amy Campbell / Anna Giust3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alex Lea
published 4
3.73
Megan Case
published
3.60
Kimberly McNeese
published
3.51
Mary Lindsey Lumley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.32
Taylor Murray
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Taylor Berry
published
3.22
Courtney Owens
published 3.5
2.93
Cortney Hodges
published 3.5
2.88
Katie Cole
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Sarah Reynolds
published
Karlee Byrd
published
Meredith Miller
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Courtney Owens + Cortney Hodges3255% gamesnot enough data
Katie Cole + Courtney Owens404 matchesnot enough data
Katie Cole + Cortney Hodges213 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly McNeese + Taylor Berry033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alex Lea
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Megan Case
7W–1L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.73
Kimberly McNeese
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
Mary Lindsey Lumley
15W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.51
Taylor Murray
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Taylor Berry
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
3.30
3.5
Courtney Owens
21W–7L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Cortney Hodges
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.93
Katie Cole
17W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.88
Sarah Reynolds
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Karlee Byrd
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Meredith Miller
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.