Teams

Apex:SeeYouInCourt:Bazemore

2025 ME Fall Tri Level · Women 3.0

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-12-07vs Apex:Tennistas:RogersLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Bazemore / Kristin Mikolaitis vs Erin Schwarz / Renee Rogers1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-12-07vs MP:MyrickLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Bazemore / Kristin Mikolaitis vs Cameron Myrick / Kate Willeford3-6, 3-6
2025-11-01vs WOOD:GP70:CopseyWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary Bazemore / Kristin Mikolaitis vs Jane Camp / Camille Nelson4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-10-19vs Apex:BrownWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary Bazemore / Linda Murray vs Sara Smith / Terri Febbraro6-2, 6-1
2025-10-19vs Apex:TriSmashers:WangLost 01
L#1 DoublesKristin Mikolaitis / Regina Kieckhafer vs Whitney Wignall / Aimee Plowman3-6, 2-6
2025-10-04vs Apex:Lob-Sters:YangWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnna-Marie DiPasquale / Regina Kieckhafer vs Susan Clement / Allie Yang-Green6-1, 6-4
2025-09-20vs Apex:HotPotatoes:BlairWon 10
W#1 DoublesLinda Murray / Anna-Marie DiPasquale vs Margaret Aitken / Erica Blair Reilly6-4, 6-2
2025-09-20vs Apex:QuadSquad:CrosbyLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Bazemore / Kristin Mikolaitis vs Andrea Otis-Higgins / Ruth Crosby1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · Women 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MP:Myrick8080247
2Apex:Tennistas:Rogers6262555
3Apex:QuadSquad:Crosby6262560
4Apex:TriSmashers:Wang4444870
5Apex:SeeYouInCourt:Bazemore4444971
6WOOD:GP70:Copsey35351072
7Apex:Lob-Sters:Yang26261385
8Apex:HotPotatoes:Blair08081698

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Anna-Marie DiPasquale
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.91
Mary Bazemore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Kristin Mikolaitis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Linda Murray
published
Regina Kieckhafer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Bazemore + Kristin Mikolaitis134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Anna-Marie DiPasquale
20W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.98
Mary Bazemore
14W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.91
Kristin Mikolaitis
2W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.48
Linda Murray
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Regina Kieckhafer
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.