Teams

LVSA-Sampoornam/Bailey

2026 Lake Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 8.5 Men Wed PM 18s

12 players · average NTRP 4.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
L#1 DoublesKyle Le / Vaughn Schmutz vs Louis Foreman / Josh Goldblatt3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPrakhar Paharia / Carl Yerger vs Bill Moore / Todd Moyer3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesHayden Tuttle / Jackson Suber vs James Banner / Ryan Whalen6-2, 6-4
2026-08-19vs LKHA-Haynes/CSD 18+ 8.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAdam Colborne / Prakhar Paharia vs Joel Reiter / Miguel Monguilod3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJon Schrand / Jackson Suber vs Micah Robbins / Austin Miller2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Men Wed PM 18s have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.01 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.55
Bryan Stonestreet
published 4.5
4.21
Adam Colborne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.18
Vaughn Schmutz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.00
Jon Schrand
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.99
Hayden Tuttle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.97
Carl Yerger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.96
Prakhar Paharia
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.92
3.90
Venkatesh Sampoornam
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Antony Jayapal
published 3.5
Jackson Suber
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Mitchell Hering
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Venkatesh Sampoornam + Hayden Tuttle5067% games+9.9% vs expected
Ashok Kumar Kuppusamy + Antony Jayapal7163% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Bryan Stonestreet
19W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
4.55
4.5
Adam Colborne
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
4.21
Vaughn Schmutz
8W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
10%89%1%
4.18
4
Jon Schrand
115W–73L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
4.00
4
Hayden Tuttle
136W–51L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.99
4.5
Carl Yerger
0W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
59%41%<1%
3.97
4
Prakhar Paharia
189W–56L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Ashok Kumar Kuppusamy
67W–41L career · no lines in 2026
<1%71%28%
3.92
Venkatesh Sampoornam
20W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.90
3.5
Antony Jayapal
76W–64L career · no lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.41
Jackson Suber
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mitchell Hering
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.