Teams

Sports Mall-DowDell/Lewis

2021 Fall Indoor League-Weekday · 4.0W

13 players · average NTRP 4.06 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-12-09vs Salt Lake Tennis-AhrendLost 01
L#2 Female DoublesTiffany Kasteler / Kristel Affleck vs Jan Chamberlain / Elizabeth Michie2-6, 2-6
2021-11-18vs Sunpro-Harlan/MortensenWon 10
W#3 Female DoublesAnnalyn Adams / Emily King vs Tamara Miller / Shannon Shepherd3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-11-11Won 10
W#3 Female DoublesAnnalyn Adams / Jennifer Rasmussen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-11-04vs Ivory Ridge-LangstonLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesKristel Affleck / Susan Koelliker vs Jen Langston / Heather Allen1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · 4.0W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sunpro-Blackhurst/Allen4219513167
2Ivory Ridge-Boren/Owens42141023203
3Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/Brooks4215923180
4Sports Mall-DowDell/Lewis42141023177
5Sports Mall-Johnson42121225190
6Wasatch Rec Center-Berg/Hronek42111329194
7Ivory Ridge-Langston33141023192
8RISE AC-Olsen33121227220
9Sunpro-Harlan/Mortensen2491533204
10Ace Athletics-MacDonald/Jones2481634228
11Salt Lake Tennis-Ahrend1581634225
12Sports Mall-Romney/Adamson1571735221

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.14
Christine Fotheringham
usually #2 Female Doubles 38%, also #1 Female Doubles 38% · published 4.5
3.99
Julie Cooley
published
3.92
Emily Wallace
published 4.5
3.85
Tiffany Kasteler
published
3.78
Susan Koelliker
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 4
Anji DowDell
published 4
Carole Sharp
published 4
3.60
Jennifer Rasmussen
published
3.59
Annalyn Adams
usually #3 Female Doubles 100% · published 4
3.45
Janice Smith
published
3.40
Amanda Lewis
published 4
3.39
Lindie Hoggan
published
3.14
Kristel Affleck
usually #1 Female Doubles 50%, also #2 Female Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tiffany Kasteler + Annalyn Adams5069% games+17.9% vs expected
Susan Koelliker + Christine Fotheringham5063% games+10.8% vs expected
Tiffany Kasteler + Kristel Affleck8461% games+7.8% vs expected
Julie Cooley + Christine Fotheringham25760% games+5.5% vs expected
Amanda Lewis + Kristel Affleck7652% games+5.5% vs expected
Tiffany Kasteler + Susan Koelliker311058% games+4.9% vs expected
Carole Sharp + Janice Smith21563% games+4.7% vs expected
Susan Koelliker + Julie Cooley9067% games+4.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christine Fotheringham
213W–62L career · 8 lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
4.14
Julie Cooley
63W–26L career · no lines in 2021
53%47%<1%
3.99
4.5
Emily Wallace
93W–98L career · no lines in 2021
74%26%<1%
3.92
Tiffany Kasteler
166W–104L career · no lines in 2021
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Susan Koelliker
133W–81L career · 1 line in 2021
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Anji DowDell
95W–74L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Carole Sharp
95W–47L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Jennifer Rasmussen
43W–77L career · no lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.60
4
Annalyn Adams
122W–97L career · 2 lines in 2021
24%76%<1%
3.59
Janice Smith
126W–62L career · no lines in 2021
66%34%<1%
3.45
4
Amanda Lewis
49W–31L career · no lines in 2021
79%21%<1%
3.40
Lindie Hoggan
58W–74L career · no lines in 2021
81%19%<1%
3.39
3.5
Kristel Affleck
123W–116L career · 2 lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.