Teams

TYCC Party at the Net - M. James

2025 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Adult 18 & Over Day- Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
W#1 DoublesMargaux Parizeau / Haley Lorenzen vs Lisa Lalis / Francesca LoMonaco6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMolly James vs Meltem SENTURK7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCaroline Doyle / Kristine Harb vs Cindy Crum / Michele Curtin6-0, 6-0
2025-02-21vs Riverhills - C. CoyleLost 12
L#1 DoublesSarah Lindbeck / Anne Merrill vs Christine Coyle / Lindsey Vance6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSarah Boe vs Carrie Renter4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesElise Szafranski / Kelley Sadlowski vs Laura Britz / Denise Morgan6-2, 6-2
2025-01-24vs VDF String Queens - S. CornellLost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer Burby / Sarah Lindbeck vs Karalee Kulek-Luzey / Vanvisa Cheung0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSarah Boe vs Brittany Kissell1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMargaux Parizeau / Haley Lorenzen vs Dorimar Siverio-Minardi / Summer Popejoy6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesCaroline Doyle / Kristine Harb vs Elizabeth Hanlon / Michelle Graba6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesMolly James vs Rachel Sultenfuss3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKristen Richards / Jennifer Burby vs Kim Sverdlow / Liza Geist1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult 18 & Over Day- Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.25 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.64
Kristine Harb
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.59
Caroline Doyle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.33
Sarah Boe
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.15
Kristen Richards
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.12
Haley Lorenzen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.10
Sarah Lindbeck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.09
Molly James
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
1.99
Kelley Sadlowski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Elise Szafranski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Berk
published
Margaux Parizeau
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caroline Doyle + Kristine Harb5083% games+25.3% vs expected
Kelley Sadlowski + Molly James123 matchesnot enough data
Haley Lorenzen + Margaux Parizeau213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristine Harb
10W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%15%85%
2.64
3
Caroline Doyle
7W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
2.59
Sarah Boe
8W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%88%12%
2.33
Kristen Richards
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
0%99%1%
2.15
Haley Lorenzen
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Sarah Lindbeck
8W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Molly James
10W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Kelley Sadlowski
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.99
Elise Szafranski
3W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Berk
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Margaux Parizeau
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.