Teams

1: Hayes/IS 18s 7.0X

2026 TUL MIXED 18 & Over League · 7.0 MIXED

11 players · average NTRP 3.38 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-10vs 3: Devinney/GR 18s 7.0XWon 21
L#1 DoublesSean Burns / Madison Hayes vs MONICA MCCAFFERTY / Donell Trinh6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAndrea Hayes / George Martinez vs Marissa Devinney / Chuy Socarro6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesEleanor Doyle / Aaron Hayes vs Heather Livingston / Prakash Subramaniam7-5, 6-2
2026-07-06vs Tulsa/Cuadra/18&over7.0XWon 20
W#1 DoublesMadison Hayes / George Martinez vs Byron Canfield / Sandy Hightower7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAmy Bradt / Anthony Maddox vs Hayli Leavitt / Gregory Kopervos6-2, 6-3
2026-06-26vs Semenova/GR 18s 7.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesAnthony Maddox / Amy Bradt vs Raymond Bayer / Samantha Boyce7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMatt Holland / Macie Brubaker vs Catrina Edgar / Eric Edgar6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAaron Hayes / Eleanor Doyle vs Erin Capps / Stuart Maus3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-24vs 4: Hunt//LF 18s 7.0XWon 21
W#1 DoublesMacie Brubaker / Anthony Maddox vs Payton Wynes / Katie Carpenter7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesGeorge Martinez / Madison Hayes vs Jennifer Baines / Jonathan Bush5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJosh Hinkle / Eleanor Doyle vs Allison Creel / Brandon Kelley6-1, 6-1
2026-06-22vs Baugher/PH 18s 7.0XSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAnthony Maddox / Amy Bradt vs Stefanie Lee / John Lee6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesEleanor Doyle / Josh Hinkle vs CHRISTOPHER DICKASON / Michelle Dickason1-6, 1-6
2026-05-29vs Williams/PH 18s 7.0XSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMadison Hayes / Aaron Hayes vs Misty Jackson / Jeffrey Jackson6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMatt Holland / Macie Brubaker vs Stephanie Loseke / Barrett Loseke4-6, 3-6
2026-05-17vs Celestain 18s 7.0X/LFLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnthony Maddox / Amy Bradt vs Heather Duncan / Edward Obana6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMadison Hayes / Aaron Hayes vs Matthew Prim / Casandra Celestain6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEleanor Doyle / Josh Hinkle vs Ronnie Acebo / Jennifer Blackshare2-6, 4-6
2026-05-08vs Sides/FR 18s 7.0XWon 20
W#2 DoublesMadison Hayes / Josh Hinkle vs Jim Sides / Lindsay Farrar6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMatt Holland / Macie Brubaker vs Ashley Torres / Jason Smith6-7, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · 7.0 MIXED
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
11: Hayes/IS 18s 7.0X7116820197
2Tulsa/Cuadra/18&over7.0X6216819182
33: Devinney/GR 18s 7.0X62141026235
4Baugher/PH 18s 7.0X53141022192
54: Hunt//LF 18s 7.0X5317723216
6Hale/LF 18s 7.0X53141023200
7Celestain 18s 7.0X/LF53131128231
8Gilbert/LF 18s 7.044121227215
9Elizondo/LF 18s 7.0X3591535258
10Semenova/GR 18s 7.026101434251
11Williams/PH 18s 7.0X2681634252
12Sides/FR 18s 7.0X2671737229
13Evans/GR 18s 7.0X0861839253

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Anthony Maddox
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
Andrea Hayes
published 3.5
3.14
George Martinez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
Madison Hayes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.10
Matt Holland
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.03
Josh Hinkle
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.96
Aaron Hayes
usually #2 Doubles 58%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.86
Eleanor Doyle
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.84
Amy Bradt
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.63
Macie Brubaker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Sean Burns
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Josh Hinkle + Madison Hayes7268% games+9.6% vs expected
Aaron Hayes + Madison Hayes7160% games+2.9% vs expected
Josh Hinkle + Eleanor Doyle2351% gamesnot enough data
Eleanor Doyle + Aaron Hayes4151% gamesnot enough data
Sean Burns + Andrea Hayes314 matchesnot enough data
Amy Bradt + Anthony Maddox224 matchesnot enough data
Anthony Maddox + Madison Hayes404 matchesnot enough data
Eleanor Doyle + Matt Holland303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anthony Maddox
46W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
61%39%<1%
3.46
3.5
Andrea Hayes
23W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
George Martinez
80W–78L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.14
Madison Hayes
57W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%21%79%
3.11
Matt Holland
36W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.10
Josh Hinkle
51W–50L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.03
3
Aaron Hayes
67W–31L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
2.96
Eleanor Doyle
98W–46L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.86
3
Amy Bradt
100W–73L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.84
Macie Brubaker
31W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%17%83%
2.63
Sean Burns
23W–38L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.