Teams

3-MScurtu-HS

2022 Eno River Mixed 55 & Over · 55 & Over Adult Mixed 8.0 Evening

9 players · average NTRP 3.78 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-10vs 1-KLahey-CHTC-55+ 8.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesEleanor Hoover / Philip Sweigart vs Wendy Nelson / BRYAN WRIGHT2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesSusana Harvey / James Pappas vs Valerie Conklin / Jeffrey Kopf2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-07-31vs 1-KLahey-CHTC-55+ 8.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesMircea Scurtu / Kathy Endres vs BRYAN WRIGHT / Wendy Nelson4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesNannette Goodwin / Philip Sweigart vs Boyd Blackburn / Andy Blackburn6-1, 6-3
2022-07-21vs 2-CJones-EnoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMircea Scurtu / Kathy Endres vs James Robbins / Angela Allen3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPhilip Sweigart / Tammy Sasser vs Kenneth Kornegay / Cynthia Jones1-6, 6-7
2022-06-30vs 2-CJones-EnoLost 01
L#3 DoublesLindsay Benton / Susana Harvey vs Kenneth Kornegay / Sheryletta Lacewell2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-06-21Won 10
W#1 DoublesScott Beddingfield / Nancy Draughon vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-09vs 2-CJones-EnoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesScott Beddingfield / Nannette Goodwin vs Destry Jordan / Lynise Devance2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesTammy Sasser / James Pappas vs Paul Brewster / Cynthia Jones6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult Mixed 8.0 Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Kathy Endres
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
Nannette Goodwin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.77
Susana Harvey
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.65
Eleanor Hoover
published 4
3.58
Philip Sweigart
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.51
Tammy Sasser
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.49
Scott Beddingfield
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.48
Nancy Draughon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Donna Newell
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Beddingfield + Tammy Sasser2449% gamesnot enough data
Philip Sweigart + Nancy Draughon4248% gamesnot enough data
Scott Beddingfield + Nancy Draughon123 matchesnot enough data
Philip Sweigart + Nannette Goodwin303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kathy Endres
104W–60L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Nannette Goodwin
313W–205L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
3.5
Susana Harvey
402W–157L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
<1%2%98%
3.77
4
Eleanor Hoover
17W–19L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Philip Sweigart
64W–64L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%26%74%
3.58
4
Tammy Sasser
174W–175L career · 2 lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.51
4
Scott Beddingfield
64W–75L career · 5 lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
3.49
3.5
Nancy Draughon
210W–73L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Donna Newell
21W–14L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.