Teams

Win Nguyen Situation

2019 One Doubles · 4.0 Men

3 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Zachary Kinavey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Truc Tran
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Stefan Youngs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Results7 ties
2019-08-04Lost 01
L#1 DoublesStefan Youngs / Matthew Nguyen vs Kevin Hughes / Anh Ngo6-3, 6-3
2019-07-31Won 10
W#1 DoublesPhuoc Nguyen / Stefan Youngs vs John Rake / Ken Nichols6-3, 6-3
2019-07-29Won 10
W#1 DoublesZachary Kinavey / Truc Tran vs Bradley Sumoge / Joshua Goddard6-4, 6-3
2019-07-22Won 10
W#1 DoublesZachary Kinavey / Truc Tran vs Michael Cheng / Huy Pham6-0, 6-0
2019-07-17Won 10
W#1 DoublesZachary Kinavey / Truc Tran vs Rowan Schmidt / Ross Williams6-2, 6-3
2019-07-14Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPhuoc Nguyen / Stefan Youngs vs Rowan Schmidt / Ross Williams6-3, 6-3
2019-06-19Won 10
W#1 DoublesZachary Kinavey / Truc Tran vs WILLIAM KENDALL / Randal Eckerdt6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Zachary Kinavey
83W–41L career
6%87%8%
3.79
4
Truc Tran
67W–43L career
not enough data
4
Stefan Youngs
25W–40L career
10%90%0%
3.65

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.